>>10746208
>>10746208
And anyone who knows about stuff knows that if you release a secure operating system and support secure communications, and systems, and give it away to become the back bone of reliable systems, for critical infrastructure, and fund open source efforts . . . .everyone knows that you aren't the villain at the tech fair.
I figured that the role of the skeptic in full view of what is shown, and being able to intuit what occurs behind the curtain, so to speak, was a vital role to play.
the one who is not owned but observes from a place of knowing, and writes the commentary that future generations will consider when trying to decypher the events of this era.
When everyone is owned who is a player . . . the story won't get written in a way that future generations will gain useful history by reading through it.
We need the anon to be the vigil that blabs the details of what they see right now going on around them.
NSA has been a provider of tools to allow that to happen.
so why would anyone fear them?
oh: they are bad people, that is why they fear them?
and of course then the skeptic says 'oh, bad, 'saying bad people' points off'
and we all laugh and say 'God Bless the NSA'
don't you mean USA?
oh, ya, that too.