dChan
Anonymous ID: 968590 Sept. 22, 2020, 12:18 p.m. No.10746048   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6070 >>6339

TIL, Logically.com thinks that QMapAnon is really behind the whole thing.

 

https://twitter.com/2old_notdead/status/1308484508241424385

 

I can't imagine why we don't take these shill pieces seriously.

Anonymous ID: 968590 Sept. 22, 2020, 12:53 p.m. No.10746423   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6477 >>6536 >>6583 >>6713 >>6756 >>6787

Susan Collins wants to be underemployed:

 

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said on Tuesday that she will vote against a Supreme Court nominee if one is brought to the Senate floor before the November election.

 

“My statement was a model of clarity. … I made it very clear, yes, that I did not think there should be a vote prior to the election. And if there is one, I would oppose the nominee," Collins told reporters, when asked if she would oppose a nominee before the election.

 

Collins added that her decision was not based on who the nominee is — President Trump is expected to name his pick on Saturday — but because of the proximity of the election and the decision by Republicans in 2016 to refuse to move forward with Merrick Garland, then-President Obama's Supreme Court nominee.

 

"Not because I might not support that nominee under normal circumstances, but we're simply too close to the election, and in the interest of being fair to the American people – and consistent, since it was with the Garland nomination," Collins said.

 

"The decision was made not to proceed, a decision that I disagreed with, but my position did not prevail. I now think we need to play by the same set of rules," she added.

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/517622-collins-says-she-will-vote-no-on-supreme-court-nominee-before-election