If I had the ability to do that, be fucking sure I would.
Has anyone actually found any coherent meaning to Catherine Herridge's pen positions (re: Tweets)?
How so?
Or like a raving child, desperate to be heard.
SERIOUSLY THOUGH,
is there any cogent analysis of Q's posts? Like down to the nitty gritty?
I just imagined that there were autists that would actually map it together… or try.
Is there really no one? No online community that actually tries to piece this shit together?
Is it really reasonable though, to advocate or even be ambivalent to military control?
I feel the ol' Hegelian Dialectic taking course… IT'S THE ONLY WAY. Questionable.
Create the corruption (HRC, BC, CF, GS, etc.) or allow it. Way until it comes to head. Provide the solution. ITS THE ONLY WAY.
Never asked