Anonymous ID: d157c6 Sept. 22, 2020, 8:15 p.m. No.10751480   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1506

>>10751143 Last bread

>>10751143

>But there’s more.

>But there’s more.

 

Red Cell analyses are products that are speculative in nature and sometimes take a position

at odds with the conventional wisdom.52

 

Would this be "cures"?

Anonymous ID: d157c6 Sept. 22, 2020, 8:24 p.m. No.10751566   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10751506

IDK…hoping that's it.

 

There was an interesting patch inthere about Dubya turning down PDBs to the Congressional Intel Committee… while 'dasting, it didn't seem to fit in with the current narratives - or Im just not seeing the link between the two.

 

Still reading it.Discerning….

Anonymous ID: d157c6 Sept. 22, 2020, 8:42 p.m. No.10751696   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10751506

Then there's this footnote:

29 With regard to protecting classified information, the executive and legislative branches each have

criticized the other for failing to adequately guard against unauthorized disclosures of classified

information. Neither branch, however, has suggested it is without fault. Rather, the debate, as often

as not, has centered, to varying degrees, on the relative number of unauthorized disclosures that can

be traced to each branch, the degree of sensitivity of such disclosures, and whether each branch has

been sufficiently aggressive in its attempts to identify and penalize the perpetrator.

 

Could be a ShiftySchiff or DIFI moment materializing.on the horizon.

 

Or Im just a dork and can't see what else was obvious to others.