Anonymous ID: 348ea2 Sept. 22, 2020, 10:14 p.m. No.10752373   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2381 >>2411 >>2428 >>2443 >>2447 >>2452 >>2501 >>2508 >>2510 >>2530 >>2540 >>2566 >>2578 >>2661 >>2780 >>2829 >>2855

B2 ???

BB will be the PICK for rbg seat ???

 

Stealthy move by POTUS???

 

keyword search: BADE not Bader

 

https://qanon.pub/?q=B2

 

then keyword search : B2 as in Bridgit Bader

 

 

future prooves past ( crumbs drops)???????

 

When a B2 bomber is no longer stealth (think public statements made last week) what must that signal?

ACB and others are the headlines.

 

Planned/coordinated attacks on BARR coming [smear campaign].

Barr to be impeached?

 

Information warfare.

 

Sometimes silence is necessary in order to protect select 'public' releases.

 

Bridget S. Bade

https://ballotpedia.org/Bridget_S._Bade

Anonymous ID: 348ea2 Sept. 22, 2020, 10:16 p.m. No.10752381   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2411 >>2428

>>10752373

 

78/21 confirmation hard to say no now??? Right??

 

B2? BB Bridget Bade

 

Roll Call Vote 116th Congress - 1st Session

XMLVote Summary

 

Question: On the Nomination (Confirmation Bridget S. Bade, of Arizona, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit )

Vote Number: 51

Vote Date: March 26, 2019, 02:15 PM

Required For Majority: 1/2

Vote Result: Nomination Confirmed

Nomination Number: PN213

Nomination Description: Bridget S. Bade, of Arizona, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit

 

Vote Counts:

YEAs78

NAYs

21

Not Voting

1

 

https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=116&session=1&vote=00051

 

https://www.congress.gov/nomination/116th-congress/213

Anonymous ID: 348ea2 Sept. 22, 2020, 10:49 p.m. No.10752530   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2540 >>2661 >>2780 >>2829

>>10752373

>>10752428

 

https://lawyers.findlaw.com/profile/view/1860057_1

 

http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/?refPageViewId=5d71f65124111b0a

 

Home

U.S. Magistrate Judge Vacancy, Phoenix, Arizona - Application Period Now Closed

The Judicial Conference of the United States has authorized the appointment of a full-time United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Arizona at Phoenix, Arizona. This position is created by the elevation of former United States Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

 

The full public notice is available below, however, the application period is now closed.

 

PDF icon US District Court 0619H PROOF 1.pdf

 

http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/us-magistrate-judge-vacancy-phoenix-arizona-application-period-now-closed

Anonymous ID: 348ea2 Sept. 22, 2020, 10:51 p.m. No.10752540   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2661 >>2780 >>2829

>>10752530

>>10752373

 

Senate Confirms US Magistrate Judge Bridget Bade to Seat …

 

Search domain

 

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/ce9/2019/03/26/Bade_Confirmed.pdfcdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/ce9/2019/03/26/Bade_Confirmed.pdf

 

U.S. Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade of Phoenix, Arizona, to serve as a judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Senators gave their consent by a vote of 78-21. Judge Bade was nominated to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on January 23, 2019.

 

https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/ce9/2019/03/26/Bade_Confirmed.pdf

Anonymous ID: 348ea2 Sept. 22, 2020, 10:56 p.m. No.10752566   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2578 >>2661 >>2780 >>2829 >>2855

>>10752373

https://www.courthousenews.com/ninth-circuit-probes-worth-of-imdb-law-in-fight-of-hollywood-ageism/

 

(CN) – Signaling an uphill battle in the fight to revive a blocked California law that requires a popular entertainment industry website take down actors’ ages upon request, a Ninth Circuit panel on Monday struggled to understand how the restriction will deter age discrimination in Hollywood.

 

“No one disputes your compelling interest, but how does the statute accomplish this?” U.S. Circuit Judge Bridget Bade asked during a hearing in Pasadena.

 

The state of California and Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA) implored the appeals court to reinstate the law, which would force IMDb.com to take down actors’ ages upon request if those actors subscribe to IMDb’s premium service, IMDbPro.

 

The goal is to prevent casting directors from using the information to discriminate, but IMDb insists that restricting the publication of factual information about public figures violates the First Amendment.

 

“We are here because in 2016 the state of California passed a law that outright prohibited certain disfavored yet factual speech by a single speaker,” IMDb attorney John Hueston told the panel.

 

U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria permanently enjoined the state law, AB 1687, in February 2018.

 

Defending the statute, SAG-AFTRA lawyer Douglas Mirell argued that actors’ agents used to control what information was shared with casting directors and potential employers. IMDb’s dominant position as the go-to source for information on entertainment professionals has changed that formula, he said.

 

“IMDb essentially creates a template by which age discrimination is facilitated by presenting that age in a prominent and conspicuous fashion near the very top of every IMDb listing,” Mirell said.

 

Bade questioned how that reasoning squares with Supreme Court decisions holding that the government cannot restrict speech merely because a third party might do something illegal with the information.

 

Mirell cited the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations, which found that a newspaper could not print advertisements for “men only” and “women only” jobs.

 

That argument did not go over well with U.S. Circuit Judge Mark Bennett, who asked how a publication “directly promoting illegal conduct” relates to IMDb posting actors’ ages online.

 

Bade then asked if it is illegal for websites like Wikipedia and Google to publish a person’s age or date of birth.

 

Mirell’s answer: no.

 

“Then it’s not speech proposing an illegal transaction,” she said.

 

U.S. Circuit Judge Johnnie B. Rawlinson further questioned why the law only applies to IMDb when other sites like Google and Wikipedia can post the same information, which any casting director could use to violate antidiscrimination laws.

 

“Look at what your purported goal is and whether the statute is a good fit for those goals,” Rawlinson suggested.

 

California Deputy Attorney General Amie Medley told the panel that state lawmakers concluded AB 1687 was necessary because the internet has made antidiscrimination laws less effective.

 

“The laws that we have prohibiting potential employers from asking for this information, they just aren’t working the same way in this age of the internet where a company like IMDb can make this information publicly available to everyone including all potential employers,” Medley said.

 

Mirell then insisted that courts should not be second-guessing the Legislature’s reasoning when it comes to which laws will be most effective in accomplishing certain goals.

 

Judge Rawlinson took umbrage with that point.

 

“We’re not second-guessing the Legislature,” Rawlinson said. “We’re doing our job to determine whether or not this legislation is constitutional.”

 

After 50 minutes of debate, the panel took the arguments under submission.

 

IMDb was created in 1990 by the company’s CEO Collin Needham, and its website was launched in 1996. The online database of onscreen entertainment has grown to feature more than 3 million movies and TV programs along with 6 million cast and crew members. It boasts 250 million unique visitors each month, according to IMDb.

 

Bade and Bennett were appointed by Donald Trump. Rawlinson was appointed by Bill Clinton.

Anonymous ID: 348ea2 Sept. 22, 2020, 10:57 p.m. No.10752578   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10752566

>>10752373

 

Bridet Bade

 

>Bade then asked if it is illegal for websites like Wikipedia and Google to publish a person’s age or date of birth.

 

> Mirell’s answer: no.

 

>“Then it’s not speech proposing an illegal transaction,” she said.

Anonymous ID: 348ea2 Sept. 22, 2020, 11:05 p.m. No.10752610   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2636 >>2648 >>2655

>>10752310

all of it is sick

bedknobs

old geezers

LOOK AT HAND over hand of boy

what does it really look like is happening

while red shoes on boy and old man

in a bedroom with the bednobs

and a old squeeze box all shriveled up "imagery" ont eh table and a little bouy POP up toy with an alarmed face

sick fucks right in our faces

 

PB

>>10707519

>>10707566

Anonymous ID: 348ea2 Sept. 22, 2020, 11:09 p.m. No.10752636   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2648 >>2655 >>2662 >>2663 >>2669 >>2697 >>2704 >>2709 >>2722 >>2748

>>10752610

>>10752310

 

with fresh eyes as an adult,

 

looks like an old man jerking a little kid

 

they called it a "finger on fire, let me show you how to put it out like this"

 

Pinocchio sets his finger on fire, Geppetto rushes to put it out.

 

https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/51725/39-hidden-mickeys-disney-animated-movies

 

and notice the big old squeeze box on the chair that looks like aold shriveled up dong

 

and the pop up toy face like a little boy would react to an old gezer jerking him off

 

above the squeeeze box

 

all in a bedroom

 

with an open window a pervert might crawl in from

 

and the cum cloud

 

and the RED SHOES

 

mickey ear chair back with CROWN and looking glass hole symbology

 

horse, like hung like a, another old pedo gross referenced

 

and WOODen bedKNOBS in drawing

 

even the old pervert has on the red shoes just like Q shows us

 

entire drawing is a pedo fantasy/memory

 

cartoons were not just for kids, they were for pedos who knew what was up

 

and all was placed just for them

 

cannot make out what is on the glass window

 

Looking glass Mickey Ear chair, code for PEDOS LOOKING at the cartoon creeper

 

Pinocchio (1940)

 

After the Blue Fairy turns the puppet Pinocchio into a wooden boy, Mister Geppetto and his cat Figaro and goldfish Cleo celebrate his arrival.

 

When Pinocchio sets his finger on fire, Geppetto rushes to put it out. They pass by a chair, which looks like Mickey Mouse’s head.

Anonymous ID: 348ea2 Sept. 22, 2020, 11:11 p.m. No.10752648   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10752636

>>10752610

 

Get kid all worked up (erection FIRE finger)

 

old man rushes over and shows how to PUT IT OUT ( jerk him off)

 

>they called it a "finger on fire, let me show you how to put it out like this"

 

>Pinocchio sets his finger on fire, Geppetto rushes to put it out.

Anonymous ID: 348ea2 Sept. 22, 2020, 11:16 p.m. No.10752669   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10752636

the sqeeze box made to look like a old mans dick

is sick

with a surprised kid face from the pop toy

hand clearly putting out the fire finger is a hand wrapped like over ones dick to jerk it

sick evil fucks

Anonymous ID: 348ea2 Sept. 22, 2020, 11:32 p.m. No.10752748   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2807

>>10752722

>>10752636

I absolutley loved this as kid when they played it on the projector at school (projection monitor)

We pulled back the curtains in the room (curtain monitor)

We al layed on the floor and watched in the dark room as little kids in SF Bay ARea public school

It is all ruined now

 

 

I'm no fool having fun

https://youtu.be/cjNf_d9nnxE

unfortunately 1/2 the film is faded

Anonymous ID: 348ea2 Sept. 22, 2020, 11:58 p.m. No.10752855   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10752566

>>10752373

 

>The goal is to prevent casting directors from using the information to discriminate, but IMDb insists that restricting the publication of factual information about public figures violates the First Amendment.

 

>“We are here because in 2016 the state of California passed a law that outright prohibited certain disfavored yet factual speech by a single speaker,” IMDb attorney John Hueston told the panel.

 

>>Mirell then insisted that courts should not be second-guessing the Legislature’s reasoning when it comes to which laws will be most effective in accomplishing certain goals.

 

Judge Rawlinson took umbrage with that point.

 

>>“We’re not second-guessing the Legislature,” Rawlinson said.

 

“We’re doing our job to determine whether or not this legislation is constitutional.”