Okay, so I might have a spicy take here.

AS = Adam Schiff

187 = California Proposition 187

AS 187 = Adam Schiff, California Proposition 187

Envision this scenario:

HRC replaces Scalia. LL is put on the SC to replace RBG. SC is heavily liberal and pro-cabal.

AS begins a pre-planned, MSM-aided media storm about illegals being discriminated against, voter ID laws, etc. Media outlets push pseudo-intellectual pieces for open borders and on the evils of voter ID.

AS brings up the failure of Cal. Prop. 187. Argues that the federal district ruling against it ought to be applied to all states. A case begins in the lower courts where a state is sued for voter ID laws, or some similar barrier to voting manipulation. Arrives at SC. SC rules for AS and cabal using overruling of 187 as precedent. Rights of illegals (and cabal voters/cutouts) are enshrined. Open borders are given a legal precedent.

Does that seem about right?

187:

https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_187

“California Proposition 187 (also known as the Save Our State (SOS) initiative) was a 1994 ballot initiative to establish a state-run citizenship screening system and prohibit illegal aliens from using non-emergency health care, public education, and other services in the State of California. Voters passed the proposed law at a referendum on November 8, 1994. The law was challenged in a legal suit and found unconstitutional by a federal district court.”