The mainstream media's latest cover story for how the Trump Russia investigation got started - BEFORE Papadopoulos apparently blabbed about Hilary emails - doesn't make any sense
Let's see why. THREAD
https:// twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/986198273370271744
Carries ore weight if congress does it.
If Sessions does it, it's cause Trump told him to.
TRUMP'S ONLY SOLVING THE NORTH KOREA SITUATION TO DISTRACT FROM STORMY!
>And can we assume him not handing over docs is just for show?
I think if the docs haven't been released yet, it means they are part of a criminal proceeding.
The 2018 Pulitzer Prize Winner in National Reporting
Staffs of The New York Times and The Washington Post
For deeply sourced, relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest that dramatically furthered the nation’s understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the Trump campaign, the President-elect’s transition team and his eventual administration. (The New York Times entry, submitted in this category, was moved into contention by the Board and then jointly awarded the Prize.)
http:// www.pulitzer.org/winners/staffs-new-york-times-and-washington-post
I think we should go through the list of articles and highlight all the false info. I can't remember NYT or WaPo issuing a correction or retraction for any article they put out.
Anybody got an idea how many of these Pulitzer winning articles contain false information from anonymous sources
http:// www.pulitzer.org/winners/staffs-new-york-times-and-washington-post
twitter back up in Canada