>>10789435 Dutch reporter has been looking for Q 'adepts' for an article (highest ranking anons?)

Guise do we have a “highest ranking anon”, if so no one told meI didn’t know there was a competition here. Do we have a spokesman? seriously guise thanks for not sharing. Anyways I nominate myself as highest ranking anon, because no one else would come forth. Although on second thought, I really like being anonymous so, I decline the self nomination.

There are some serious dense and stupid people in this world, don’t forget….Kek

>>10788153 Pelosi: We have arrows in our quiver vid

That sounds like some kinky sex act right?Whatever you do, don’t have sex with a Democrat

>>10790628

Absolutely. We actually nominate the lowest ranking anon to be the highest ranking anon, because no one will take the job. Unless you’re a good researcher, in that case we won’t throw you to the wolves. We are all anons

>>10790586

I agree, so disrespectful. But there’s no spokesman so what will WH say? Kek

>>10790675 Ok that’s a deal, but I’ve got to scoot out in 1 minute. Just enough fame to not notice it

>>10790847

You are a little too serious

>>10790876

Nah, but thank you, great design. if I wear that I’ll feel strange and people will ask what it’s about and I’ll have to say, “just shiposting at night” and then they’ll ask what’s shit posting, and what do I say then?