Innocent People Found Guilty qalerts.app/?n=4577.

1) If you force someone to split events from their consciousness by presenting them with unsupportable, survival-threatening events/threats/pain/danger/whatever, then you have split consciousness, whence a part of the spirit is put behind bars. But that spirit comes from God. You have thus committed a great sin.

2) If you incarcerate (for example Gitmo), or even execute, a mind-split person for atrocities in which that person was involved while in a non-conscious stete, then you disrespect the Holy Spirit.

You punish someone for something he or she does not even know happened.

So we have the situation

1) (((they))) create victims for sex/torture/cannibalism/ceremonies by splitting their mind and having "handlers" push the victim into a non-conscious state whenever desired

2) (((we))) then look at the NSA videos and judge these victims for atrocities they do not know occurred, just because, on the videos, we see that they were actively involved in those atrocities. And we then put them on the Q guilty lists.

There is a word in the bible that if I see us committing sins, then I am obliged to say it, and propose repentance. If I do not, then the sins fall upon me.

I say to those who put these innocents in the guilty lists:

• Things that happen for example here in Epstein island

https://media.8kun.top/file_store/211de8880d7bea54650f58f48385c0a570dc12bb8a00b98c226c0a2c7b43388b.png

and are caught on video, may show mind-split people actively involved while in the non-conscious state(s).

• Such people must be taken off the Q guilty lists.

Imagine: You are a victim and and are forced to suffer fear and live in hell. You don't know what happened. You are in a cage without context and do not understand. Then QT come and kill you for it. God TELLS us not to respect the beast with the wounded head. Revelations 13. But we still respect it.

The world is watching how QT deal with this problem.

>>10797429

They didnt do anything - they weren't conscious. You see that in deprogramwiki.com especially in the pdf by Svali who bravely tries to give us knowledge. God wins.

>>10797472

I try to understand what you are asking for.

Each post is different in text as I try to adapt to replies in order to get this matter across.

I do have a constant title now. Is that what you need ?

>>10797401

The people I speak of are not guilty.They were not conscious and do not know what happened. In deprogramwiki.com there is information explaining such. And I interpret Revelations 13 as referencing it.

>>10797407

You havent got it yet. The people I speak of were not conscious. They don't know what happened.

Possible reference: deprogramwiki.com.

>>10797520

I don't have a video.

I post a Subject, an image, and text.

I don't understand what you need.

Best regards

>>10797576

I have to laugh - I'm just an ordinary person coming from a mind split with some integration and can see what the victims are suffering. The mind split people I identified in the Q lists are not people I know and I have not been involved in any of the activities or places or people - I'm just coming from the ordinary world.

The best place I know to get an understanding is the pdf of Svali who is a very brave lady who tries to tell us how the mind splitting works.

Mind splitting is very common.

This is not only important for the victims. It is important for us all and QT because God warned us not to respect the beast. God wins.

>>10797598

ok. Respect for your work. I'll try to read about baking. Best wishes

>>10797611

Good words.

>>10797659

No of course I know what happened mentally. I know that there are mind split people on the Q lists - I can name some - and I know what state they are in - if they are in jail they might be split still. And I do not want them on the guilty lists and I have the right to demand that. It seems to me that you permit judgements. They certainly are not criminals if they are not conscious of the events and the context.

I seek the people who put them on the lists.

>>10797709

Thank you.

>>10797814

My feeling is that I should not give names unless it is to someone who can modify the guilty lists. That way I am talking to the right person and don't have to explain more than once.

That the people I identified as mind split are mind split is something I got from interpreting publications.

The proper way to deal with this in my humble opinion is to get advice from people who are conscious of being/having been mind split.

I think for example of somone who was interviewed/gave a talk in a video on conservativetruthnetwork.com.

Best wishes.

God is winning.

>>10798052

Will post my big post with the image on next bread.

David