>>10797459

Of course you have to add that bit about "alive as normal humans" because you're trying to slide away from His being resurrected. As for being a "normal" human, though Christ was 100% human, He was not a "normal human". He was not born of the seed of a man lest He legally inherit the slavery to sin from an earthly father, and He never sinned morally as He was also 100% God the Word. So both legally and morally, He was without sin.

As to that meeting on the road to Damascus, Christ spoke to Paul, and Christ was very much alive as He had resurrected years before.

>>10797424

Palin didn't make the "see Russia from my house" comment. That was an SNL spoof.

>>10797355

Paul was recognized as a true Apostle by all the other Apostles, and recognized as the one sent to preach to the Gentiles. Do you know something they didn't? Because they were anointed by the Holy Ghost. Did the Holy Ghost fail them when they didn't discern Paul as false? Your arguments are without logic and purposely ignore validating factors. Reminds me of the DS lawyers who are notorious for ignoring/hiding exculpatory evidence against those they falsely accuse. This is how a liar is easily picked out.

>>10797357

Yep, under orders of the Rothschilds.

>>10797582

Meh, it was more like your inability to be clear in your little sermon. Ambiguity invites correction.

>>10797596

A lot of bold claims without sauce.

>>10797581

Not at all. The signs (the gifts) were signs of the Apostles proving they were sent from God. They could freely heal and raise the dead, among other things. Paul was proven in the same fashion. Such signs were only for Apostles and not for anyone else (though others in that era of the Apostles could have a single gift, while the Apostles had all the gifts).

Therefore, you disqualify has Christ coming to you audibly.

As His coming, He remains seated at the right hand of God physically until the last enemy is put away. In His place He sent the Vicar, who is the Holy Ghost. However, the Holy Ghost never teaches anything Christ didn't teach when Christ walked the earth during His first advent.

>>10797655

"as" not "has"

>>10797630

Well, no, Paul didn't say that. The context of keeping the Law relative to what Paul was saying, was that one could not keep the law to be saved/justified. Christ Himself was indicating this to show them they could not possibly save themselves.

However, Christ saved souls in order for them to walk righteously. Paul himself said he was not without law.

This shows that rather than attempting to be justified by obeying the Law (which is not possible because Man is born in sin), one is made obedient after being justified by the Faith of Christ's Testimony (the Gospel).

One is not saved/justified BY the Law, one obeys as a RESULT of being justified. Attempting to justify oneself before God (not before men) by one's obedience is placing the cart before the horse.

So you are perverting what Paul said as well as what Christ said.

The Faith is such that one is made a just man by the Faith of Christ in order TO obey, in order to do the things for which God has ordained him. Such obey BECAUSE he has been justified by the Faith of Christ and do not obey in order to be justified.

Obedience is the result of Justification and not the cause of justification.

>>10797769

There is that inconvenient fact that Abraham was justified before he obeyed to sacrifice his son, many years before.

If Abraham were not, and had not been, accounted righteousness (justified), he would have found his own justification to not sacrifice his son.

It would have been impossible for Abraham to obey God in that moment had he not been accounted righteous first by God.

>>10797596

>The actual Apostles accepted him in fellowship and treated him like a well intended retard who was doing his best to be helpful.

Really? So they sent a retard, whom you claim is a FALSE apostle, with an important letter to the Gentiles (the Jerusalem Council). Are you implying the Apostles exposed the whole world (the Gentiles) to a false apostle, a false christ, and a false gospel? Why are you attacking the Twelve?

>>10797852

You are assuming God tested him because He was trying to find out something. That goes against the doctrine that God is omniscient.

God was testing Abraham to reveal his faith before the world and the enemy, Satan.

So not only are you questioning Paul, but God Himself. Paul didn't write that narrative of Abraham. Nor did Paul say to "forget about all that", as is evident in, for instance, Rom. 9:7.