Well, mermaids are the female version of Dagon, after all.
But if they are perpetrating what was perpetrated against themselves, they still must be stopped from doing it to others. The cycle must be broken.
The last one is bogus.
Though I'm no fan of Catholism, and am not ashamed to rebuke it, and even though I suspect a fifth column working as Vatican operatives, our laws to not provide for taking one's religion as a qualification or not.
Heinous things happened to Haitians because of filthy dreamers, but not everyone having adopted children from Haiti did so for nefarious reasons.
>God Can't enter the world through a sinful vessel just as sinful vessels can't enter heaven.
But Christ came to fulfill the Laws of Moses, and under that Law woman were not given the right to pass on an inheritance. Furthermore, the dominion was given to the Man, not the woman, who was only his help mate. Only a man, under the context of the Scriptures, could pass an inheritance. This includes the sin nature which is inherited by all children born of an earthly father. Though women could themselves inherit, they could not pass on an inheritance. So what you state has no bearing on the sin nature with which Mary was born. She couldn't pass on that inherited sin nature.
>Thus Mary was conceived immaculately, without original sin to bear the Christ: which she fully assented too.
There is utterly no Scriptural basis for that. And she didn't "assent". Gabriel told her it was going to be that way. He didn't wait for her agreement, nor did he require it.
>She's literally HOW Christ came to earth and logically as the conduit the mediatrix of grace.
A conduit does not grace make. Grace was already on the earth since God said "Let there be Light". She was the conduit of Christ's flesh. In fact, the Holy Ghost "overshadowed" her, which means enveloped. God contained her, and not the other way around. Solomon declared under the power of the Holy Ghost that God cannot be contained. This is why God overshadowed Mary while she conceived and carried the child until His birth.
>>>10799865
>the feast of passover was fulfilled in the Lamb of God who offered himself for all. We eat His flesh and drink His blood.
Well, at least that is the claim. It is said that at the Mass "Calvary is made present", and the same sacrifice of Christ's flesh and blood is "re-presented" in an "unbloody manner". What was offered at Calvary was the sacrifice for sin, of which Christ said as He was about to give up the Ghost, It is finished. He finished the sacrifice for sin upon the moment of His death because death was the payment for sin. Since that death occurred, the payment is paid in full. To perpetuate what He clearly finished is eating the sin sacrifice, the sacrifice of the dead. Christ had instructed at the Supper that its elements of wine and bread were "memorials" of His death. A memorial of an event is not an actual event, but a reminder, as all memorials are. They remind about something that happened at one time. When He said, This is my body, or my blood, it is no different than pointing to a dot on a map and saying, this is Louisville. Is the dot Louisville literally? Or does the dot represent Louisville. We often use such expressions to say things are certain objects with the understanding they aren't literally those objects.
>anyway off to the Holy Sacrifice of the Lamb!
But He finished it.
And I should have added the Supper is a Thanksgiving sacrifice, thus "eucharist". Under the laws of Moses, the sin sacrifice and the thanksgiving sacrifice were two distinct sacrifices. What kept them separated was that with the sin sacrifice, there could be no leaven present; while with the Thanksgiving sacrifice, a leavened loaf had to be included.
The Thanksgiving sacrifice could not be offered if the sacrifice for sin were not finished. Christ's flesh and blood was the sin sacrifice for His people. For this reason, on the night of the Supper, He commanded them that from that point they were to offer the sacrifice of Thanksgiving, which is the meaning of "eucharist". No Jew of that day would have mistaken the "eucharist" as the sin sacrifice.
The Apostles were Jews. Which of them blamed women for the fall of Man? They spoke about her being deceived, but not to blame. The sin nature is inherited from the father, having been passed down from Adam. It is clear he is culpable for this fall into sin. This is also why Christ is called the last Adam, as the payment was owed by a man, so a man had to remit it. God didn't sent a woman to remit it.
Just as Daniel's 7 x 7 represented Sabbath years, thus equaling to 49 years; so the "666" is calculated. Calculate 666 x 7, then starting at 536 AD, going backwards, not counting the year 0 as there isn't any such year, that will give the date of the Serpent tempting the Man to fall.