>>10786620

>>10786657

Maybe it’s not the “background”, but rather, who is standing behind POTUS and took this photo?

“Never forget those in the background” I believe Q is referring to POTUS’s background - Think mirror!Whomever took the picture is whats really important…

Who stands behind POTUS in briefings like this?

Are there other photos in this same place but of POTUS sitting in the same spot?

Maybe someone can ask the people ID’d who was standing behind POTUS and taking the picture?

Look at the crew, they are all looking at each other, none are looking at the photographer or POTUS, which means the photographer surreptitiously took a covert photo of the crew and office from behind POTUS.

Q? Is that you Q?

>>10801240

It’s all about position. The closest are the most trusted.

The man sitting closest to POTUS sits there for a reason. He knows the remaining 5, not so sure. But if they see this pic and think, think, think… they will 5+12= 17… Q

>>10801479

I personally know the female judge who ruled cause of death for Scalia.

She is a former Army vet.

Democrat.

Husband is form navy vet, he is a cannabis user, coke head and drunk.

Next time I run I to them I’ll see what I can glean from him.

Something hasn’t been right with that “death”.

They know more than what they want to say.