Chaotic Scene Unfolds As Car Plows Through Trump Supporters In California, Multiple Injuries Reported; Driver Arrested

Several people were injured on Saturday after a car plowed through a group of Trump supporters who were counter-protesting a Black Lives Matter rally in Yorba Linda, California.

The driver raced down the street as people carrying Thin Blue Line and American flags chased her, only to be faced with a line of police cars. She then continued down the wrong side of the road for a stretch before being stopped and taken into custody.

At least two injuries were reported with one being taken away by an ambulance.

According to the OC Register, the BLM march took place on Imperial Highway - while counter-protesters gathered on the other side. The conservative group crossed over to the BLM protesters to confront them when the white sedan 'came tearing through the crowd.'

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/chaotic-scene-unfolds-car-plows-through-trump-supporters-california-multiple-injuries

Activist Courts in Several Swing States that Approved Changes to Election Law Were Acting Unlawfully Against the Constitution — Will Likely Be Overturned

As if Democrats weren’t already fomenting enough chaos with their brownshirts — Antifa, BLM and the like — the Supreme Courts of several battleground states have decided to pile on.

In Pennsylvania, Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin, Democrat activists dressed in black robes have fundamentally rewritten state election laws. Among their various revisions to these crucial laws:

Mail-in ballots can be received up to seven (7) days after the election and still be counted

These ballots can be missing postmarks and still be counted

The signature on the ballot doesn’t even have to match with that of the registered voter

And, as a bonus, they have banned the Green Party from the ballot to prevent erosion of the Biden vote

All of these illegal proclamations directly contravene state law and are simply naked, partisan attempts to swing the election.

More importantly, they are in clear violation of the Constitution.

Article I, Section 4

…The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof…

The Judicial branch — at any level of government — has no role in deciding the times, places and protocols for Congressional elections.

Democrat Activists on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Who Are Trying to Launch a Coup Against the President in 2020: Christine Donohue, Democrat. David Wecht, Democrat. Kevin M. Dougherty, Democrat. Debra Todd, Democrat. Max Baer, Democrat. May their names live in infamy for all times.

Which means that even if the illegal vote harvesting scam promoted by certain state Supreme Courts at the presidential level goes unchallenged, the clear text of the Constitution prevents any other federal office-holder from being counted if it is in violation of state law.

As for the presidential election, the Constitution is equally clear, as Mark Levin has repeatedly pointed out.

Article II, Section 1

…Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector…

Once again, the legislature is wholly responsible for directing the manner of presidential elections.

Rogue Democrat partisans disguised as judges have no role in dictating the times, places and manner of elections for any federal officeholder.

But Article 1, Section 4 of the Constitution clearly dictates that any down-ticket federal elections must conform explicitly to the legislative body’s instructions. Perhaps Democrat activists disguised as judges have helped entrap their own party’s Congressional candidates in a web of deception.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/activist-courts-several-swing-states-approved-changes-election-law-acting-constitution-will-likely-overturned/

In The Midst Of A Pandemic, Blanketed In Wildfire Smoke, The City Of Berkeley Is Focused On Banning Candy Bars

It doesn't look like California is going to get the message that there's such a thing as "too much government" anytime soon - so, if you were holding out hope, this might just be the time to give up.

While the state continues to struggle giving its citizens basics, like masks to survive the ongoing pandemic and wildfires, legislators have turned their ire to the real important issue: Snickers bars.

Now, Berkeley, California is looking to implement a measure this week that would "prohibit grocery stores bigger than 2,500 square feet from displaying junk food and other unhealthy items in checkout aisles," according to CBS.

The ordinance would apply to 25 retailers in Berkeley including major names like CVS, Safeway and Whole Foods. Retailers will be allowed to sell chips and candy bars elsewhere in their stores. Oh thank you, sweet government Gods, for allowing us to continue to purchase potato chips.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest called the ordinance the nation's "first healthy checkout policy."

CSPI senior policy associate Ashley Hickson said: "This is a massive win for consumers," (we'll pause for laughter) "and public health during the COVID-19 pandemic, when grocery stores are more integral to our well-being than ever before. By offering healthier options at checkout, stores will contribute to advancing public health and level the playing field for consumers during an already stressful time."

Kate Harrison, a council member who co-authored the ordinance, said: "It's not a ban, it's a nudge." Actually, Kate, you're the nudge.

And when we see the inevitable article in 12 months that Berkeley is baffled by why the city isn't attracting small businesses anymore, we'll be able to point right back to these types of burdensome regulations. The only problem, of course, is that there's very small chance legislators in California, convinced they need to save the world from itself, will even realize the fault of their actions.

They certainly haven't so far. How long until everything but bread and water is banned?

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/midst-pandemic-blanketed-wildfire-smoke-city-berkeley-focused-banning-candy-bars

Harry, Meghan 'Election Interference' Seen as 'Violation' of Megxit Deal With Queen, Report Says

The UK's Prince Harry and his American wife, Meghan Markle, separated themselves from the British royal family in January, announcing that they would "step back" as royals and split their time between the UK and North America.

An urgent call for US citizens to "reject hate speech, misinformation and online negativity" during the US presidential election made by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, which was characterized by some as election interference, violates the terms of Megxit deal with the Britist royal family, The Daily Mail reported, citing senior royal aides.

"The [royal] family are all wringing their hands, thinking: where is this going and does this abide by the deal to uphold the values of the Queen? The feeling is it's a violation of the agreement", an unnamed source said to be a royal aide told The Daily Mail.

According to the report, if the video message by Harry and Meghan is deemed as a violation of the agreement, it will significantly lower the chances of Prince Harry being able to resume connections to the Royal Marines and the UK military.

"The door was left open", said the aide. "There were some things that Harry hoped he could opt back into. He dearly wants to hang on to the Royal Marines and the military appointments. That will be harder now".

Members of the UK royal family are traditionally required to stay neutral in political affairs. Although the couple's entreaty did not contain any direct links to US presidential candidates, many saw the message as critical of Donald Trump.

“As we approach this November, it’s vital that we reject hate speech, misinformation and online negativity", Prince Harry said in a video message for Time 100, Time Magazine's annual listicle of the 100 most influential people in the world, accompanied by his wife's remarks on "the most important election of our lifetime".

When asked for a reaction to Harry and Meghan's comments, Trump stated that he is "not a big fan of hers", wishing luck to Prince Harry and suggesting that "he is going to need it".

Harry and Meghan stepped back from official duties as members of the UK royal family in early January, intending to split their time between the UK and North America. They currently retain their HRH [His/Her Royal Highness] titles, but are not allowed to use them.

https://sputniknews.com/us/202009271080583594-harry-meghan-election-interference-seen-as-violation-of-megxit-deal-with-queen-report-says/

>>10805839

arrested is detained

question is will there be charges

International Banker Secrets Revealed. Documentary Entitled America: Freedom To Fascism Full Movie.

https://www.healthfreedom.info/freedom_to_fascism.htm

>>10805906

kek

Jewish progressives and Democrats: Barrett nomination a step backwards

Jewish progressives have criticized Amy Coney Barrett over her stance on abortion and healthcare, among other issues.

Jewish progressives and Democrats have come out against the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the US Supreme Court, arguing that nominating the Catholic mother of seven goes against everything that her predecessor, Jewish justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, stood for.

"Jewish Democrats reject President Trump’s nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett for two reasons," the Jewish Democratic Council of America (JDCA) Executive Director Halie Soifer said in a statement.

The first was the proximity to the American Presidential election in just 38 days time.

"Second, Amy Coney Barrett stands in opposition to everything the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg fought for throughout her career and threatens to reverse decades of progress with regard to access to affordable healthcare, equality, separation of church and state, and reproductive rights," Soifer said.

Claiming that Barrett's views are "far outside" mainstream public opinion and the "overwhelming majority of Jewish Americans," Soifer pointed out that just over four in five Jewish voters view the Supreme Court as one of the key matters in deciding their vote.

"We know that the Supreme Court influenced the Jewish vote in 2018 when 79% of Jewish voters supported Democrats, and it will again in 2020, to the detriment of Donald Trump,” Soifer said.

The National Council of Jewish Women's (NCJW) CEO Sheila Katz said that Barrett failed to meet the criteria of being fair, independent and qualified with a commitment to constitutional rights for everyone.

“Due to her past statements and decisions related to abortion, health care, immigration, gun violence prevention and racial justice, NCJW strongly opposes Amy Coney Barrett as a nominee to the highest court in the nation," Katz said.

“Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a trailblazer who fundamentally shifted our nation toward equality, deserves a justice in her seat who will fulfill and advance her legacy – not one who would take us backwards," she added. "In the middle of an election, NCJW’s network of 180,000 advocates across the country is dedicated to ensuring the seat stays open for the next president to fill.”

Jewish Women International's CEO Meredith Jacobs said that replacing Ginsburg with another woman was not enough.

“Unfortunately, Barrett has proven that she will not defend equality or fairness,” Jacobs said. “Her appointment is a direct threat to reproductive freedom, survivors of sexual assault, civil rights, health care access, racial justice, voting rights, gun safety, and legal protections for marginalized groups.”

https://www.jpost.com/american-politics/jewish-progressives-and-democrats-barrett-nomination-a-step-backwards-643700

https://twitter.com/DanRather/status/1309512857550163968

kek

Biden Blasted for Comparing Trump to Nazi Propagandist Goebbels

The Republican Jewish Coalition called on Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden to apologize for comparing President Trump to the notorious Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels, with Executive Director Matt Brooks blasting Biden for ‘diminishing the horrors of Goebbels and the Nazis’ with his attack on Trump.

Biden made the comment comparing Trump to Goebbels in an interview on MSNBC with Stephanie Ruhle that aired Saturday in which Ruhle served up a softball question on Trump accusing Biden of socialism. Biden also likened Trump to the communist dictator Fidel Castro.

Biden said, “He’s sort of like Goebbels. You say the lie long enough, keep repeating it, repeating it, repeating it, it becomes common knowledge, they think.” Biden followed that foul insult by saying Trump is “more Castro than Churchill.”

Ruhle tried hard to suppress a smile as Biden was smearing Trump, but finally gave in and flashed a broad grin.

RJC Calls on Biden to Apologize for “Goebbels” Comment

Today, Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden compared President Trump to Nazi propogandist Joseph Goebbels, equating one of history’s great monsters to President Trump, Biden’s political rival. RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks made the following statement:

The rule in debate is that if your only argument is to call your opponent a Nazi, you have no argument at all. Instead of engaging in a debate on policy, Joe Biden has descended to name-calling and Holocaust references.

There is no place in political discourse for Holocaust imagery or comparing candidates to Nazis. It’s offensive and it demeans the memory of the Holocaust, the suffering of the victims, and the lessons we must learn from that terribly dark chapter of history. Joe Biden has been in politics long enough to know this. To diminish the horrors of Goebbels and the Nazis by trying to attack the President with that comparison is, as we say, a shanda.

We call on Joe Biden to retract and apologize for that egregious comment.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/biden-blasted-comparing-trump-nazi-propagandist-goebbels/

Lebanese Army, Intelligence Clash With Terrorist Cells Near Syria’s Border

Fierce Clashes between Lebanese government forces and terrorist cells are taking place in Wadi Khalid right on the border with Syria.

The clashes broke out on September 26 afternoon when a force of the Information Division attempted to raid a hideout where terrorists from different cells were holding a meeting.

The terrorists resisted arrest, opening fire at the force. The Lebanese Armed Forces quickly dispatched reinforcements to the town of al-Farad, where the clashes are taking place.

According to the Lebanon 24 news outlet, three cells were meeting in the hideout to plan a series of terrorist attacks in Lebanon.

One of the three cells is said to be affiliated with Abu Suleiman al-Dandashi, a Jund al-Sham leader who was eliminated by the Syrian military in Homs in 2014. Another cell is reportedly linked to Khaled Al-Talawi. The infamous terrorist, who was eliminated two weeks ago by the Lebanese military, plotted the August 21 Kaftoun attack and was responsible for the killing of four soldiers in Tripoli on September 13.

Journalist Bassam Abou Zeid revealed that the cells’ members are Lebanese and Syrians. Some of them were killed or injured in the ongoing clashes.

The Information Division and the Lebanese Armed Forces are reportedly determined to neutralize the cells today. More information on the clashes will likely be shared tomorrow.

https://southfront.org/lebanese-army-intelligence-clash-with-terrorist-cells-near-syrias-border-video/

Al-Moallem: So-called “Caesar Act” targets Syrians in their livelihood… Syria will spare no effort to end US and Turkish occupation

New York, SANA-Deputy Prime Minister, Foreign and Expatriates Minister, Walid al-Moallem, affirmed that the political agendas in the world still precede the humanitarian ones, yet, instead of lifting the unilateral, coercive measures imposed on the Syrian people with the spread of COVID 19 pandemic, we have witnessed a renewal of these measures and imposing more of them under illusive pretexts, including the so-called “Caesar Act” which aims at pressing the Syrian people in their livelihood and daily life.

“Terrorism still represents continuous danger to the stability and prosperity in the world, it also poses the most important threats to the international peace and security,” al-Moallem added in a speech to the 75th session of the UN General Assembly broadcast via video.

He inquired if hindering what has been destroyed by terrorism in Syria would serve the Syrians, or breaking off the job opportunities and obstructing the return of the refugees, burning the wheat crops, stealing oil and combating the energy sector in Syria, if all that protects the civilians.

“It is obvious that the goal of “Caesar Act” in its essence exerting pressure on the Syrian people in their livelihood and their daily life in an inhumane scene that reminds us of the brutality through which George Floyd was strangled and through which Israel strangles the Palestinian People,” al-Moallem said.

“While we stress that the unilateral coercive measures contradict the international law in a clear and frank way, we call on all countries affected by those measures to form a unified front to face that phenomena and ease their impacts on our people,” al-Moallem said.

He affirmed that the Turkish regime is in the top of those who invest in terrorism as it is one of the terror-sponsors in Syria and the region.

“The US and Turkish forces’ illegitimate presence on Syrian territories is an occupation and Syria will not spare any effort to end this occupation with all possible means guaranteed by the international law,” al-Moallem said.

“The Turkish regime has facilitated the entry of tens of thousands of foreign terrorists into Syria and still offers all forms of support to Jabhat al-Nusra and the other terrorist organizations, and it practices the policy of Turkification and the coercive displacement, nevertheless, it has used the collective punishment policy against two million civilians in Hasaka and the surrounding towns through cutting off water,” al-Moallem added.

“We condemn the so-called separatist QSD militia who conspires on Syria’s unity and its people and loots its resources,” al-Moallem added.

http://www.sana.sy/en/?p=204286

“Australia’s Paedophile Protection Racket” – New book by journalist Shane Dowling

https://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com/2020/09/26/australias-paedophile-protection-racket-new-book-by-journalist-shane-dowling/