>>10809764
Not so quick, anon.
Consider if you will, the possibility (if not the likely hood at this point) that DURHAM was just a head fake for this specific purpose, and someone else (the stealth bomber) will deliver 'the goods' that everyone is expecting from DURHAM.
Such a plot twist would give the DS a sense of false security while at the same time providing cover for, and retaining the surprise factor such an operation would call for.
I am not understanding why anons put so much faith in what Bartiromo says anyway.
It is as if she just came down from a mountain with some glowing tablets or something.
She has been wrong more than once in the past.