>>10810576
I like how he stops after just epstein.
Because if he mentioned John of God, NXIVM, and all of the hundreds and hundreds of arrests just in the past few weeks, not too mention - children rescued from sex trafficking - he might have to admit there is some legitimacy.
In his article he just constantly states - just one example that they use to perpetuate the lies. Seriously - is he not aware of all the others? Is he just ignorant or willfully ignorant?
Aside from the Q bashing, i actually agree with the rest of the article. If he needs to lie, distort the truth it only makes him look bad or stupid or ignorant.
But maybe that’s what he was going for - to get readers who would otherwise fall for the media’s bullshit to wake up to their own conspiracy theories and how destructive they are.
In that case, i’m personally good with the article.