>>10810386

1. Durham is working on indictments, not a "report".

1. He's not the only one. Therefore, even were Durham not to indict before the election, there could still be indictments.

1. Even were there no indictments at all, the focus should be devoted to the election and the confirmation of Judge.

1. Indictments perhaps starting 11.3 and 11.4, per Q drop early on?

>>10810394

Brietbart? I know, I know, one of the resurrected. Just indulging a little.

>>10810412

Well said.

>>10810419

I suspect the Barr's were "our" guys for decades. It's been a very long operation, and they had to do their parts to infiltrate the infiltrators.

>>10810491

1840

>>10810569

180 years ago: 1840

In that year, the Whigs were against Jackson and his bank policies.