Slightly off topic. Have the four puzzles on the Kryptos sculpture at CIA headquarters Langley ever come up in discussion? Is it just random aesthetics or some underlying importance? The fourth puzzle has not been solved yet.
At this point this entire post has become copy pasta. Greetings fellow MAGAnonypede!
I hope the extra two days of preparation for the Fake News awards means we get at least one meme-worthy moment. We need an infusion of meme power. Kek is not here. This is white-knuckled willpower propelling us along. Trump must give us the big funny.
People are fascinating in that if you are of normal or above IQ you have the possibility of understanding a complicated system with subtle nuances. When evaluating your audience, you want to use parallels to frame the discussion. What would this person think is normal, abnormal, extreme? Show interest in what they like to do. Is there any time you feel like you cannot explain how you do what you do? This will let you know how they interpret things abstractly (if at all. Some people are dull.) Within a framework they already understand you can show them how other concepts can be looked at the same way.
You are correct if you have the attention already from your audience. I was considering the problem of “shutting down” and how to be nonthreatening with a heavy topic. I was trying to describe how I would slowly build up interest and as the final step have the self-realization.
We need a short video similar to “The Voice of Enigma” to briefly summarize as an introduction to Q.