Anonymous ID: 9032f8 Jan. 10, 2018, 3:19 a.m. No.11554   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1573 >>1614

>>11513

>>Did she get a deal?

I'd assume so based of Q's question:

>>What if No Such Agency alerted May to the kill plan per POTUS?

telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/12/05/mi5-foils-islamist-terror-plot-kill-prime-minister/

Anonymous ID: 9032f8 Jan. 10, 2018, 3:33 a.m. No.11573   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1614

>>11513

>>11554

>How many times did they try?

Unsure how to research this one.

>Was the judge the same each time?

Unsure, but I found speculation that the judge who signed off on it is Rudolph Contreras.

>>"Additionally, and in complete concurrence with our prior research, DiGenova states first-hand knowledge that FISA Court Judge Rudolph Contreras did not recuse himself – but was rather forcibly recused from the Michael Flynn case by either U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts or the aggregate FISA court. On December 7th, 2017, it was announced that U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras was mysteriously recused from the Special Counsel case against General Mike Flynn, five days after Judge Contreras accepting the initial pleading. No explanation as to ‘why’?

We have speculated that U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras was recused, either by himself or by challenge, because he is also a FISA Court Judge and could have signed off on the October FISA warrant that led to the wiretapping and surveillance of General Flynn. Joe DiGenova states he has first-hand knowledge Contreras was forcibly recused."

 

theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/07/wow-interesting-interview-with-joe-digenova-links-doj-nsd-john-carlin-with-fisa-court-judge-rudolph-contreras/