Anonymous ID: f165fa Sept. 27, 2020, 11:35 a.m. No.10811338   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1374

this is dedictated to all the shills,

and to those who like to see sexy dancing girls from 1960s television

 

OMG: and they have guns!

so there it is I did post girls with guns once or twice.

Anonymous ID: f165fa Sept. 27, 2020, 11:42 a.m. No.10811423   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1500

>>10811361

this is like the monty python bit with the joke that was so funny that the soldiers that heard it would laugh themselves to death.

fortunately the idea is a gag and that doesn't really happen.

Anonymous ID: f165fa Sept. 27, 2020, 11:51 a.m. No.10811515   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10811500

the real religious people are not fake, and we know who they are when we read their words . . .

 

wow I wish this microsoft keyboard wouldn't mangle up the keystrokes. It shows up in the log as 'too slow'

Anonymous ID: f165fa Sept. 27, 2020, 12:12 p.m. No.10811737   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1749

>>10811697

insertion shill trying to do the double donk

as if I'd look to you to understand awareness, congruence of facts, and sad truth about your kind of constant nonsense.

you fail, you always fail, and you keep doing it.

it's consistent.

in your consistence to lose you, in that sense, never fail to lose.

so doesn't that prove me wrong?

and I don't care because I understand what real discernment is, and you don't have it.

sorry.

 

so tell me what it means, oh you who cast doubt on other people's cognitive prowess.

 

listen, anon, this kind of thing that this shill does is obvious. If he has a real issue with what I see about the comment that I commented on, then why does he/she/it not express it to me in a loving way?

becuase it's a donk shill who is only here to make other feel sad or upset or to doubt themselves.

 

so it didn't give me any insight. It fed me nothing but 'oh I see your issues, '

but it has no answer, it has no solution, no love that would move The Sun and the other stars.

Anonymous ID: f165fa Sept. 27, 2020, 12:25 p.m. No.10811864   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1887

>>10811845

there might be 'group think' , that would be some anons doing similar things.

that I see.

hive mind implies a bee in charge, the queen

we don't all think and act and sound the same anon.

you conclude what you want, it doesn't matter. The bread will end.

In future breads you will forget this, we will have some laughs, and the shills will still be horrible.

 

so in conclusion: no hive mind but sometimes a group think.

and not everyone is in it.

and there are multiples of that.

so it's not quite the same as 'hive mind'.

 

get it.

 

am I still a shill, in your estimation?