Anonymous ID: 6a5aaa Sept. 27, 2020, 12:47 p.m. No.10812101   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2142

>>10811997

Housley is arguing the semantics of indictments v. reports, but Bartiromo is reporting that Durham can’t drop his findings before the election because it would prejudice the vote.

Anonymous ID: 6a5aaa Sept. 27, 2020, 1:02 p.m. No.10812251   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2281

Re Bartiromo reporting no indictments pre election (as much as I hate to note it because this anon is over the frustration of endless delays not to mention the frustration of feckless datefagging)… Q’s original timeline of the dates 11/3 actionable 11/4 works in several ways that could benefit Patriots. First, the indictments would be seen as less political if dropped after the election. Second, a clear in-person election night perceived Trump win would add the legitimacy of a mandate for action. Third, the earthquake of post election indictments would suck the air out of the TIP planned coup by chaos.

 

I’m not convinced by my own theory, but I submit it for critique