>>10814230 lb
>Who would want their name on the investigation? Think
I am thinking you are correct. No body would want their name on it. Nobody would want the Clintons to know they were/are being investigated.
Q did imply there was another Durham out there.
It's best nobody knows who that is.
you take the time to post twice, but you don't give a name
nobody got time for this nonsense.
spit it out!
>Listen carefully to the Fox News Report, it was also named in the Notables.
the video was posted in nov 2016, but it doesn't say when the video was aired on tv.
Do you know when that was?
Also, since it was before Trump took office, the investigation was under Comey's control.
You misread what I posted.
I said that we don't know who which special prosecutor/investigator that Trump/Sessions put in charge to investigate the Clintons.
All I have read from public records is that Durham is investigating the FBI agents who investigated the clintons….not the clintons themselves.
in other words, Durham, may be investigating the same people who are mentioned in the video, not the Clintons themselves.
>I keep reading Anons posting "Obidan wins, steps down, BHO or Kameltoe steps up….blah blah blah"… and I don't see that ever happening as that would open up a whole diff can of worms that we the people would have to fight to overturn. (And I don't know where to begin to do that) I can't wrap my head around that and the fight involved to prove they rigged it. It's too late at that point.
you are right, anon. Don't worry about it.
those are just troublemakers.