>>10816436 (lb)
Agreed; evil. Invoking evil thoughts.
>>10816450 (lb)
The Supreme Court has already made a distinction for fictional "minors". Look, I agree with you anons from a moral standpoint and have fought/argued against it from a moral standpoint here, and on other forums (it's not free speech; period). It's essentially the same thing, but, again, not CP. It's a "likeness" which is obscene and shouldn't be allowed; period. The makers and distributors of it should be held to similar punishments from a legal perspective. The issue is, the Supreme Court left the decision too vague.
Thank God RBG is getting replaced with ACB. It's what we need.
>>10816464 (lb)
What was her name again? Bonus points if you remember.