>>10821005 (pb) anon posits: Wouldn't it be something is there was some overlap between project Odin (speech protected by block chain)

How does Snon know that project Odin is speech protected by block chain?

CM never said once or even hinted at what project Odin is.

Anons have thought that's what it is but never has CM said shit about it other than it's coming soon. Since October of last year, kek.

Anything can make the notables these days.

>>10821697

It would help if you didn't jump to conclusions.

Powerful deplatformming tool does not equal block chain by default.

I had that tweet in mind when I wrote my criticism. You're still basing your thoughts on assumptions.