Anonymous ID: 78a3b1 Sept. 28, 2020, 9:15 a.m. No.10822093   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2140

>>10822057

>So your example of my fuckery is offering the board a nomination, getting 5+ yes votes and then adding it to the GLOBAL NOTABLES only to have bakers try to remove it 2 breads later and then wait to 4am to remove it officially.

>>10822088

 

look at this:

 

"You are talking about past additions. this whole "voting" thing - while not bad in principle - is hard to enact in reality on a board like this. Which is why the custom in the past was for baker to ask anons if a particular change sounded ok and try adding. Sometimes there was a discussion, sometimes not. Often, one or moar anons would propose that a thread or some other resource be added. One of two more might say yes, baker would say ok and it was added."

 

"If anons or bakers in future breads really didn't like it, it came out. Sometimes there were some back and forth stuff, as we worked out best resolution."

 

"Doh changes thread was created to address comm problems, so that anons or bakers wondering about doh changes could see who made changes and why. I continue to use it and try to insert updates."

 

@GYB: >>>/comms/28365

 

this drama is so dramatic.

Anonymous ID: 78a3b1 Sept. 28, 2020, 9:26 a.m. No.10822200   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2234 >>2244

>>10822140

 

I'm not freebaker. They have dug their own hole, for themselves. They are known to change pb notes on multiple occasions after being told off about it by more than three people, so they can't argue out of that.

 

as far as anything else, it really is all drama unless you have the pictures. those will stand on their own merit.

 

As far as GB goes, I've never actually seen them baker, but they have an opinion like anyone else. That's between you and them.