I have no way to verify if this man speaks truth, maybe you can shed some insight into whether Mr. Weston's video is useful information?

synopsis:

according to Mr. Weston the data analysys of postitive results should have used an equation like this:

number_of_positive_outcomes - (number_of_tests * error_rate)

but instead they used:

number_of_positive_outcomes - (number_of_positive_outcomes * error_rate)

which would be a far small number of posatives, and perhaps none.

Mr Weston says it's a British National Scandal that will take down the government over there.

do we believe him?

I know, think for yourself. but anyone with insight?

>>10823702

replace the line which reads:

"which would be a far small . . ."

with:

"the second equation gives a scary number. The first, which should have been used, gives zero or almost no positives."

>>10823755

they are afraid of a graffiti wall!

>>10823856

they are out in the cold and told to wait,

and kind of know their fate?

>>10823861

They were illinformed.

they voted as they were told?

All of these 'evangelicals'?

Mr. Kinzinger, I respect your service.

you have made a vast error in your vote today

first: there is Q, and there are anon.

the name Qanon is just a term to aggrigate the activity.

you must see us as individuals.

you must see each poster as a unique person here.

this is a free speech zone.

we were shut out of everywhere else.

I regret your decision.

however I would still say to anyone asking from your district to return you to Congress.

Thank you for your service, both in Congress and elsewhere.

>>10824151

you're adding to the story.

He went willingly, is what I read.

>>10824158

Mr. Big

Mr. Fig

Mr. Jig

Mr. Zig

Mr. Wig

It's Mr. Wig!

did I miss someone?

you know, there can be more than one answer