Anonymous ID: dd1e81 April 17, 2018, 5:59 p.m. No.1083656   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3722 >>3743

>>1083529

 

This is being brought up a lot but I don't see Q in any posts confirm BDT meaning bulk data transfer. Q has said "BDT" 5 times now and each time it seems to be referring to the pre-knowledge they had of that (attempted) bombing.

 

First time:

 

>Do you believe in coincidences?

>"Blunt & Direct Time"

>BDT.

>Think currency.

>Think fireworks.

>Thwarted.

>Message delivered.

>These people are sick!

>Q

 

Second:

 

>DEFCON 1 [non-nuke FALSE]

>COMMAND?

>WHY?

>NECESSARY?

>NO SUCH AGENCY.

>Where did POTUS stop [post] ASIA?

>IT WAS NECESSARY.

>FOR GOD & COUNTRY.

>IT WAS NECESSARY.

>NO OTHER VEHICLE TO REGAIN ENTRY.

>:[AGAIN] direct pre-knowledge.

>:[AGAIN] warning ALERT.

>Think BDT.

 

Third:

 

>Side_by_Side (graphic form):

>BDT/False Flag posts vs actual news of bomb >attempt(NYC)_

>DEFCON 1 posts vs H scare_

>[2] above represent PRIMARY indicators.

>Q

 

Fourth:

 

>Think BDT NYC ‘attempt’ & Barlow.

>Not stated for verification of credibility.

>Why are we still here given foreknowledge of events?

>No FBI investigation into this?

>Impossible to locate?

>Less than 10.

>Who are we talking to?

 

Fifth (Today):

 

>BDT & DEFCON.

>Direct.

>Q

 

It seems like every time, including today (because the BDT & DEFCON were together) that he was highlighting foreknowledge