>>10834861 (PB)
Sure … why not? His (former?) boss got one for doing nothing (and then did nothing good). Seriously … WHAT could possibly excuse such a nomination EXCEPT one socialist propping up another?
>>10834861 (PB)
Sure … why not? His (former?) boss got one for doing nothing (and then did nothing good). Seriously … WHAT could possibly excuse such a nomination EXCEPT one socialist propping up another?