>>10836244
He wants evidence from any reply from the DOJ back to Sidney with respect to her letter to the DOJ just before she became Flynn's council. June 6th 2019 letter.
Powel:
Only response was from DOJ was that there was no brady evidence (exculpatory showing innocence likely)
She did get an answer from someone else and got the brady evidence she was looking for.
She has a number of objections to enter
He asks if she is talked to the President about Flynn.
She said she can not discuss it.
She would think any conversations would be part of executive priviledge.
He says she does not work for the government
She says atty client priv is not limited to government.
He is drilling her to know who she spoke to.
She said she spoke to president to update in last couple weeks.
He asks if she did it in writing.
She said no, verbal update, one time, to inform him of general status, and she had asked him not to pardon Flynn.
She answers him that she did not ask the president to do anything with respect to the case.
This is disgusing. Treating her like she is the one on trial for updating the president.
Now he is challenging her ethics.
UNREAL.