Flynn hearing had a tiny detail I found interesting.

Sydney Powell said she spoke with POTUS to give a general update on the case and asked him not to issue a pardon because it resulted in a meaning that the crime never happened.

She needs Flynn completely exonerated so she can help him get his losses back.

If the crime never happened, he suffered no harm.

She raised Contreras should have already recused before Flynn plead guilty in his Court.

That too was a Giant detail that Sullivan tried to run over and interrupted her before she concluded her entire point which involved him.

Basically what Sydney was saying is Contreras hearing should have been voided because he was on the FISA Court and was compromised by the dinner with Strzok and Page. If Contreras didn't void the plea, Sullivan was required to. Sullivan claimed he didn't know the reason Contreras recused and weakly said Flynn perjured himself regardless of what she is now saying. That was a way to reassert jurisdiction over the case. ( weak attempt IMO )

Coontreras has a problem because he allowed the hearing where Flynn entered the guilty plea to go on and an order to come out of that hearing. He lost his Judicial Immunity that day and Sydney made that known.

What she said suggested she also thinks Sullivan may have lost his immunity also.