>>10842697 ( me ) (last bread lawfag jr. ) after thought to better explain why I am saying this.

Sydney said "VOID" when referring to the status of the guilty plea that happened in Contreras Court. She referred to it in past tense. Not should have been, she said it WAS VOID.

The only way that can be true ( Sullivan didn't dispute her position he just changed the talking point ) is if Fraud Upon The Court was the reason for recusal. hat means Contreras had to not only recuse but render all decisions by him void.

A Judges decisions, after recusal, are not voided in any other circumstance . They can be reversed but the word VOID was the key