Negative Schumman Drop, Inverse Problem, Q-Bursts

>>10852913 /pb

>>10852944 /pb

>More Schumman weirdness….this time in the OTHER direction. baker disclosure: don't know what any of dis means.

>NEGATIVE drop in the Schumman resonance down to 3hz or so…

Gotta be fukkin kidding me. Anon has not had enough covfefe to fully process yet, kek.

Negative Schumman Drop, Inverse Problem, Q-Bursts.

Perhaps this negative drop in Schumman resonance can be mapped back to a location? Were there any massive lightning discharges during the debate?

Inverse problem

One of the interesting problems in Schumann resonances studies is determining the lightning source characteristics (the "inverse problem"). Temporally resolving each individual flash is impossible because the mean rate of excitation by lightning, ~50 lightning events per second globally, mixes up the individual contributions together. However, occasionally extremely large lightning flashes occur which produce distinctive signatures that stand out from the background signals. Called "Q-bursts", they are produced by intense lightning strikes that transfer large amounts of charge from clouds to the ground and often carry high peak current.[26] Q-bursts can exceed the amplitude of the background signal level by a factor of 10 or more and appear with intervals of ~10 s,[30] which allows them to be considered as isolated events and determine the source lightning location. The source location is determined with either multi-station or single-station techniques and requires assuming a model for the Earth–ionosphere cavity. The multi-station techniques are more accurate, but require more complicated and expensive facilities.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schumann_resonances#%22Inverse_problem%22