>you did it now!
Once upon a time perhaps. No longer.
>Anons with iPhones can always choose to switch to a device that would allow them to view mp4s on the board. Wanna see it? there's a way to personally take that responsibility and not tell others to adapt to your needs.
We have 17 sets of notables, why wouldnt this be done for them?
NOTABLE!!!!
>Not notable we don't notable anon 'mic drops' beause that would be gay
But we do notable Tom Fitton being voted by anons as worthy of a medal! NOTABLE!
>Lin Wood's tweets are in this bread
>Fakeway Pundit is just clickbait to see what is already readily available from the source
So? It is still notable and has received multiple notable votes. Its notable.
Multiple notable votes. Anons say it goes in, so it must. NOTABLE
>no. secondary source.
>part of the baker's job is to reject lame notables.
NOPE. Anons say notable. Thems da rules!
>incorrect and oversimplified.
Exactly correct and exactly on the money. It is how things are done and how they are run. MULTIPLE anon votes for it to be notable, its NOTABLE! It is exactly how the rules were explained by a baker, therefore it must be true.
>probably one of the gaslight bakers.
>you don't even have the discernment to know.
Does not matter. Multiple anon votes means NOTABLE
>shills can get a handful of posters to "nom" an obviously bogus post
Was told then that it does not matter, multiple anon votes means NOTABLE