As per Q's instructions, I took it upon myself to download all of the videos from

>>1084200

>>1084200

>>1084200

It could all be a larp. I haven't checked the times before/after Q post, which I think we should do because they seem to reference things in Q posts. If they were posted before the Q post, that would be an absolute indicator that it's another actor of some sort.

If it posts after, the prior could still be true, but then it raises the idea of someone reacting to Q posts. It could be a random, weird anon, or it could be bad actors putting out instructions. Does anyone know how to get specific time posted data from youtube?

Files are being uploaded so I can share as we speak.

>>1087135

As I was looking through it, I found some things interesting with the names. There's different sort of Clowns: Black, Blue, Red, and White.

If I was going to guess: Blue, Red, and White are all clowns that do not know they are acting nefariously. Black clowns know for sure who they're working for, even if they don't know what they're doing exactly. This is all CONJECTURE

(how many of you people sowing discord actually know for sure you're acting of your own accord?)

The QRC CODE leads to a download helper link. Not sure what it could be for exactly. On the one hand, it could be proof that this is a misdirect as the link goes "nowhere". On the other hand, it trigger could make the subject use the QRC code to download download helper, which they would then use to download another video.

UnderAttack has a link to

https:// vimeo.com/263436299

No archiving that I have found so far has any record of this page ever existing. The page could be purposely false, or veiled in some way.

>>1087135

>>1087165

>>1084200

Not sure if anyone is still interested, but here:

https:// www.dropbox.com/sh/7tndttafvpkrtnx/AACpJU3VhMu39vAvHRnqGiaxa?dl=0

Did any other anons investigate this?

>>1087166

Not sure if it's a legit, but here's a screenshot like you asked.

>>1087200

>>1087199

Not sure what to think. The first thing, I think, is seeing if this case number actually exists.

>>1087204

>>1087200

Clowns. Anyway. Back to work.

>>1087192

>>1087221

>>1087166

Looking through it, this is the source:

https:// scannedretina.com/2018/03/29/i-n-d-i-c-t-m-e-n-t-presented-on-behalf-of-the-american-sovereigns/

Whoever posted it initially is a CLOWN.

Because the origin website clearly states that it is a DRAFT.

>>1087234

Yep

>>1087226

Baker, this is likely NOT notable.

>>1087251

>>1087251

>>1087253

Yes, that's what I meant. It's someone's fantasy project. It's not legit.

>>1087306

It's a model, clown. You and everyone talking about it is a clown.

DID YOU CLICK ON THE YOUTUBE LINK?

WHICH TYPE ARE YOU?

Black

Blue

White

Red

Do you even know, you goddamn clown? Does that upset you that you and the others around you don't know that you're working for evil-doers?

>>1087333

Be discerning anon. There's no seal, no notary or anything on this document. The person, legit, could have just typed it up in word and posted it online.

BAKER

DO NOT PUT THE "INDICTMENT" DOC INTO NOTABLES.

NEW CLOWN STRAGETY

It's not new this time, you dumbasses. They have anons building rep by agreeing with other anons, then posting fake documents, which they then start agreeing with each other, putting notice on the document.

Anyone questioning the document, despite noting in

VERY SPECIFIC WAYS

Why the document is not notable, is immediately called a shill/clown without actually putting forth counter-claims.

CLOWNS ARE ACTIVELY TRYING TO BUILD REP. THEY'VE FINALLY CAUGHT ONTO USING POST IDS.

>>1087606

I've caught you all and your strategy 100% of the time.

There are no coincidences.

You are not as good or protected as you think you all are.