>>1087288

BAKERS BAKERS LOOK HERE, PLEASE… COMMON LAW LEGALFAGS, PLEASE…

SHILLS WILL BE ALL OVER THIS, PLEASE…

THIS MAY BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO TAKE BACK OUR REPUBLIC, PLEASE…

If I am reading this right and it is legit, these are Common Law Grand Jury indictments! HUNDREDS maybe THOUSANDS… in one lawsuit. Uranium One is included… HILLARY, READ, BLM, JUDGES, SHERIFFS, ETC…

BOOM x1000

This is ALL the actors we want…

I looked at pacer.gov and this is filed. The last notice is a non-judicial foreclosure… i.e. taking place outside the Court. They are trying to bury this indictment. Scalia, before he died, wanted the American people to take back the Grand jury process from the US and District Attorneys. I believe this is something we should look at and organize around.

The United States is one of only two common law jurisdictions in the world, along with Liberia, that continues to use the grand jury to screen criminal indictments.[1][2] Generally speaking, a grand jury may issue an indictment for a crime, also known as a "true bill," only if it finds, based upon the evidence that has been presented to it, that there is probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed by a criminal suspect.

>>1087444

Docs from pacer.gov

>>1087444

Court case and Scalia stating that the Grand jury belongs to the people!!!

http:// 911justicecampaign.org/the-grand-jury-belongs-to-the-people-antonin-scalia-1992/

>>1087456

I will check the doc again and delete if this is the case. Thx

>>1087462

Nope, legit… Check yourself on pacer

>>1087475

This is a Common Law Indictment. Summons attached. Respectfully, criminal and family court are very different. It is the US ATTORNEYS OFFICE that would prosecute.

>>1087477

This is not my indictment. Whoever did it is attaching everyone in current executive, legislative, and judicial branch. I am confused a little too. I don't see BO or former executive branch officials. Fuck…

May be a distraction, I don't know.

>>1087495

It is not fake, but not going anywhere… Thanks for help!

>>1087533

Thank you for your help Anon.

>>1087566

Easy on the shill claim. If you notice the thread, it started by review of the ACTUAL docs. There are 65 docs in pacer and it would cost hundreds to get them.

Anons, worked together to review and determine the docs are authentic; however, the case was dismissed.

AGREED KEEP OUT OF NOTABLES, BUT READ THE ENTIRE THREAD AND DISCUSSION BEFORE LABELING.

There are lots of SHILLS, but I assure you I am not one of them. Excited at the prospect and premature exhuberence, guilty. Shill, objection heresay.

Respect…

>>1087566

To be clear, I am only talking about the docs I posted to get thread started. I got mine from pacer.gov, not some random website.

Still agree nothing after inspection.

>>1087594

I only saw it for first time today. Gotta pacer bill to prove it.

>>1087637

Count them if you would like… $0.10 a page. Many docs over 20 pages. Indictment states 647 pages. Do the math. If you see SHILLS everywhere and in everything, check the mirror. Been here as long as you. Long illogical diatribes drawn from conclusions without facts don't make something true. I have supported all of my supposition with attached docs and when other Anon pointed out it was dismissed for lack of attorney, I stopped. Ease up, we are all working for a better world.

>>1087647

Not sure if this still works but you can give it …

https:// www.reddit.com/r/socialmedia/comments/4ec7ro/does_anyone_know_how_to_export_twitter_follower/d1ytop3?utm_source=reddit-android

>>1087677

I do misunderstand. Based on what I saw in the initial docs, subsequent docs, and the conclusion I and others came to based on documents lodged with the Court (not some random website where the seal may be clear copy/paste) I can't come to conclusion of shill. The person who posted the thread I ran with may have been a shill, but the whole Indictment brings light to Common Law Grand Juries (however poorly executed by the United Common Law Grand Jury from a organization at https:// www.nationallibertyalliance.org/) is not in the interest of a shill to push.

Scalia wanted the people to take back their govt through the common law Grand jury system, which was usurped and replaced with statutory law. The people cannot be free if the only party that convenes a grand jury is the govt. Constitution gave the people the Grand jury to protect us and give us power. This is why I was so excited. If you knew what I think I know about this subject, you wouldn't label anyone that brings this up as a shill. Don't take my words for it, here is Scalia on the subject.

http:// 911justicecampaign.org/the-grand-jury-belongs-to-the-people-antonin-scalia-1992/

Again, nothing but respect…

>>1087693

Seriously, very good catch!