>Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first ensuring the safety & well-being of the population, shifting the narrative, removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success, defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes, freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities, kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc etc. should not be participating in discussions.

At this point, Q (false flags, bombings, general terrorism/mind control vs. the planned, methodical take-down of chain of command, etc.,) is there a nuclear option for stopping this? I understand that collateral ramifications would be horrible but, is there a fail safe and is it under consideration?

>>1087383

I take ''martial'' law as part of the plan–the pre-described narrative. I'm talking about the shit that sends millions to the hospital with puking fits. I'm talking about "dropping it all." They have it all. Is there a scenario where dumping the ugliest becomes the plan? is my question.