Here's the post >>10867468 (pb)
If you look at the replies anons are pretty consistent in calling it out as Fake and Gay.
Good job anons.
I was in that bread no one really fell for it. The best anon effort to debunk came from this anon >>10867855 (pb) in my humble opinion.
Using publicly sourced images of the Epstein cell, anon counted the rows on the windows and saw it didn't match up. After that bread, I checked out so don't know how the attitude developed bet anons afterwards concerning the video. But at the time we were pretty much all in agreement that it was Fake and Gay.
100 percent completely understand and agree with your sentiment. But, I had to defend the homies. Even though you weren't attacking or insulting, just disappointed, I assume. But fret not fren, the anons didn't fall for it. You can still proudly call yourself an anon without embarrassment.
Still important that Q said something. That way the shills don't break our balls with it for the next 30 breads straight.
Ok, well this is pathetic. Immediately, my eyes told me it was George Clooney. As I would think anyone else born before 92 would see immediately as well. Shit maybe even kids born in the year 2000 can immediately recognize Clooney.