>>10871976

You get the same response: (I won't keep doing this, though)

Anon, Credit has been digital currency all along.

You realize few people actually use paper cash these days, don't you?

Your central currencies have already been digital for decades now.

A straw man has been erected for you to target with your ignorant screeches.

Crypto boasts a decentralized ledger, which is exactly the thing that Central Banks DO NOT WANT. If everything is public and it can't be altered, then the banks cannot fix the value of the Euro or Dollar anywhere near as easily.

It's a shame that more of you have yet to realize this.

/ourguys/ gave us Blockchain technology. Governments across the world have been using it for quite some time, but once an expanded version that saw adoption broke through the private bubble that governments around the world had been keeping Blockchain in, most populations around the world were able to perceive the value of a decentralized ledger which the Banksters were no longer able to collar.

It's awful how little all of you still know about crytpo.

So many of you have fallen for the propaganda and, unfortunately, you're about to miss the spike again, meaning you'll have to wait another five years another time.

>>10871984

Yeah, okay, but can we address the loosh farm issues, guys?…

Fake "racism" seems like it's a little less important than having the whole monetary system shift to a paradigm of never ending wage slavery and we're letting public sentiment for the very key to that cage become eroded under the false guise of "protecting people's financial freedoms".

This shit is only getting worse and someone from the admin or from /ourguys/ needs to figure something out before things get worse.

We only have a year or so before the next wave hits and it's sort of feeling like you guys are working in the opposite direction on this.

What gives? Why can't any of /ourguys/ talk about the loosh farm and the tools we were given to escape it?

I get that we need to dial back the blue bird perspective of "muh racism" and I don't disagree about it.

I just really wish you guys would expand the overton window…

Things would accelerate significantly faster after the election if we could start growing economic certainty again. The faster we get it going, the quicker we escape the loosh farm.

I really wish you guys would see it as more of an imperative.

>>10872035

>>10872303

James Alefantis

What an interesting last name, right?

>>10872628

>Amy Boney Carrot

>>10872634

It is. The whole baker debacle is a ruse and should be entirely ignored.

FastJack was right.

>>10872668

It's just a slide.

I've gotten roped in too many times too, anon.

We just need to remind each other sometimes.

Anyone that doesn't just bake when they're in the kitchen shouldn't be (You)'d.

FastJack said we should just gut the notables and baker drama but Q had him dial it back, likely because the notables were somewhat helpful for disseminating intelligence, although I think it works better if anons just explain things to normies themselves or teach them how to decipher things.

Either way, we should apply the same standard across the board here: anyone that doesn't contribute more often than they do contribute should just be ignored.

When we worry about who's rhetoric matches up with what screen name too often, we have failed to become an information dissemination platform and instead become a political cesspool of bait and dilution.