Good morning, Anons.
Daybaker here.
I don't know if I'll be in for another chaotic day or not, so I'll do my best to be here on standby.
Baker, how are you holding up?
>ban free speech.
This argument is childish.
No serious workplace allows a pack of niggers to waltz onto the factory floor and start flinging monkey shit at the machinery.
Similarly, no serious politician allows BLM fanatics and DACA criminals to overrun their public appearances and speak over them.
"Freedom of speech" is the allowance of a platform to speak without government harassment, not the allowance of harassment itself.
More bluntly, "freedom of speech" is not turning into a fucking doormat and allowing any moron with a half-functioning brain to run roughshod over yourself and those trying to work hard.
That being said, the shills can switch IP's quicker than liquid shit.
As such, there's little to no point throwing out a ban every time one rears their ugly head.
Moreover, overuse of bans will result in one or two of the more uppity anons getting banned and turning that event into its own slide, defeating the purpose of banning in the first place.
This is the most defensible argument for the scant use of bans.
Stop pretending to be on a moral high ground with 1A - that's not the fucking point.
Incorrect.
>James Comey… was not fired because of the phony Russia investigation where there was NO COLLUSION.
vs.
>James Comey… was not fired because of the phony Russia investigation were there was NO COLLUSION.
The first instance is grammatically correct.
The second is not.
IDiot: c476a1
Pic related.
Sad but true.
I'm actually amazed it responded to me without a direct response from me.
That means it's human, which makes it all the more sad.
Billions of years of evolution, wasted.