ironic humor isn't really funny when it's used unironically.
points off for not saying 'this is satire' at the very start, or within the copy, or at the end.
so you are going, in the dough, with stuff that we were warned against using yesterday.
well, baker, you are so ironic and funny.
anon, this baker is not one of us?
explain how fakeness like this helps us?
This is the bread
where the baker uses images that are not proven to be real, and have no sauce, and are said to be ones that would make us look stupid if we go with them.
and serve no purpose.
so figure it out, anon.
realize that sometimes the majority of what is posted is non sauced and not anons who post it.
a cabal is an unholy cartel
that is how I see it.
a cartel is an accepted way that normal people use to over come the control plane of the cabal, and they have to deal with the darkminded aristocrats who dish out the backhanded meanness and expect the 'vassals' to pay up.
cabal is not cartel
cabal are doing the evil of overlords.
cartel are trying to survive in an overlord environment.
the mistake of the cabal in Washington, and what will basically untie the shoe (and hand it to hannkkie?) is that the cartels are not immoral like the cabal. and try to follow rules, even if they are the 'laws' that cartel forces governments to make htat no one respects at all.
and thus the cabal has roused the righteous and holy of various cartels (unions, etc) and Cabal got some 'splaining to do.
some of us here are : the 'hunterthompson' plane splaining it as if it's a dream and you just don't know.
shut out because we didn't fit the bill and had been red pilled ahead of time, that didn't take away the ability of many here to go on with it anyway.
The cabal is going down, and Seth can't do shit stop it.
You went to London around the same time, Jack?
Qanon is not a person or a group.
it's a description of a phenomena that belies a lack of understanding of what that is.
in otherwords: saying Qanon doesn't mean what they claim it does.
they've personified the process of these breads, the anon, and Q, as if it's 'one minded', when it's individuals.
does everyone understand now why some of us always said 'hive mind is bullshit'? becuase we know that the idea of that is a 'thoguht put out' to try to farm it to us.
it makes us seem crazy (we all have telepathy?)
it's not true (it isn't, we rarelry agree, and even the Bakers, who are obvious all dating or married to each other squabble in full view).
so how can there be hive mind?
group think, perhaps.
(plus 'hive mind' implies a queen bee type).
so, ya, the congresscucks are really showing their fear.
this is a chaulk borad, or graffetti wall. Why does that scare them?
they are afraid of free speech.
for example a congress jerk who gets a free broad cast every sunday if he wants it dares to tell the rest of us we can't shitpost from our living rooms.
But he's still done other good stuff.
that's why I'm so dissappointed in him . . .
reject this one , and do not concur!
but the congress dude said in his podcast that the power is 'we the people'.
so it isn't ?
then why doe congressdude not support us?
(rethorical questions, with obvious (or is it) ironic questions, no answers are expected)
there is no 'radical cult' this is slander.
appologize!
hey, if there is oversite and your name gets known, all the anon could sue you for slander except THERE IS no person named QANON, nor a group.
we are anon.
we post here
like when we were in collage at the wall of the trainstration, writing things political anonymously, except this isn't vandalism, nor is it illegal.
uses the word over and over.
we know that it's being used by those who would shut down the board, and yet you keep it up.
and red text.
so your name will be known too?
are you human?
how does what I say express anger?
When presented shill memes trying to farm the idea of violence I say 'reject this one, do not concur' and you say I am either 'mad: angry' or 'mad: insane'?
how do you get that?
Oh, ya, you are a shill bot. and have no way to read emotions from a post.
Carry on.
what emotion am I right now?
"We reject that Qanaon is a conspiracy, and see it only as a chat room with a lot of bored patriots, and shills who attack them constantly. We reject the conspiracy of Qanon because it is fake: there is no group of bad people doing horror who are Qanon.
thus the theories or theory are/is false, and Qanon is a hoax.
Q is real
Anon are real
the idea that it is a conspiracy is a smear of Q and Anon, and that is the 'Qanon conspiracy' that they are bad.
but Q and anon are righteous.
and thus we reject the Qanon conspiracy that says that they are bad.
and we embrace Q and the anon.
This is what the house agreed to?
(of course I know that it isn't, but it would be a saner kind of resolution)