>>10888092 (lb)
It's not actionable. There's a public optics take on this, though, so I don't know if I agree with "meaningless", per se. To us, we get a nice list of morons voting "YEA" and find out exactly who wasn't afraid to show their support for free speech.
That's good stuff, either way.
>Remember, there is no bad publicity.
This is the correct answer, and wins one internets today.
Man… I really like this chick.
Oh, you better believe there was some dual meanings in that post, anon.
It was the bread with this at the top of it.
We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
Tulsi is hotter than Padma Lakshmi.