>Was called our for a notable two times times in pb tonight but baker missed it. >>10892817, >>10893057, >>10893272, >>10893419
they have refused to notable this since last night
cuz those boards are infested, presumably.
suspect the subject of the notable and the bakers are on the same team
good satire for a liberal
seconded
>bakers used to hand off to ANONS, not namefags. if that anon fucks up the other anons will know very quickly (Where are the notables? -> someone steps in and takes over.) All this gatekeeping is utter malarkey.
even better, if you bake, make a new bread the moment they pull this shit.
but don't get the idea that any of this bin bullshit is how we actually do it when these faggots aren't gatekeeping.
> no anon taps it yo
what the fuck does this mean?
you've had anons nomming it all day.
more bullshit