This should be fun
>just because of some "WarRoom fags"
I find it to be an outstanding reason, however you already have one and, as wr has bragged several times, they have several perma-sections in the dough. So not at all sure why anything got changed at all.
>This is what happened when an anon asked to try baking for the first time today, notice as soon as he said he didn't want to post on comms he was instantly attack and called a shill nigger.
Silly boy, why dont you try and get some facts straight. Firstly >>10888964 is nothing even close to an attack. In fact, its good advise that has nothing to do with comms.
Secondly > Again, not an attack and nothing against comms.
If you think you can carpet bomb at a far different time and not have others see it, then thats a fools errand. Both of those were me. I dod, in no way, attack you, attack comms or attempt to discourage you from baking. Good day sir.
>>10889011 should have been included in the second point.
This anon is indifferent
.
>they*.
>all i've ever done in war room is lurk and scroll and come right back to the general.
Apologies, believed you were a baker. My error.
>you were right, i am a baker, i thought you were referring to me as a war room fag.
Nope, only said that you (bakers) already have one who bakes. I still stand by having them anywhere in/around/near any form of assistance is just as bad and dangerous as abcu and babyfist. Now that we have that cleared up, have a fine evening.
RESPECT KB, that is all. Good night and good luck