Anonymous ID: b19fea Oct. 2, 2020, 8:14 p.m. No.10896099   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6175 >>6200

>>10895840

>>10895893

sounds like you haven't been baking much lately.

you don't have to have qanonbin, pastebin is ok. but need something.

it's now customary for bakers to offer proof of previous bakes when checking in, this is because WarRoom fags were sticking stuff in the dough that anons didn't want. So new protocol was started.

 

Ya got a bake with a "you"? That's a start.

(I'm not the signed in baker right now so am not offering but just giving you some idea of what's up and ways to start baking again.)

  • another baker

Anonymous ID: b19fea Oct. 2, 2020, 8:20 p.m. No.10896179   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6200

>>10895859

>just hand off

forget it. it's not bullshit to ask for a bin.

 

when @fj said in April 2019 that bakers must be responsible for deciding whether to handoff, he didn't give ideas for how we avoid shill bakes (like WR bakers who baked to insert their stuff when it wasn't wanted).

 

Bin system developed to avoid that problem. Accepted pretty well accepted at this point. Not perfect but pretty good. If a baker is new or returning, they need to do a little negotiating but that's only a temporary problem.

Some oldfag returning bakers don't understand why at first but most are ok with this when it's explained why it's done.

 

Of course,shills don't like it. But shills never like anything.

 

cc: >>10895893

Anonymous ID: b19fea Oct. 2, 2020, 8:22 p.m. No.10896192   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10895904

>This is not a thread to thrash any one baker

My favorite line in the intro.

100% accurate but unintentionally funny.

Thread does not exist to thrash any one baker - exists to thrash multiple bakers!

Freudian slip???

(Have a nice day.)

Anonymous ID: b19fea Oct. 2, 2020, 8:31 p.m. No.10896295   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6317 >>6327

>>10896200

yes, "you's" can also be a problem.

no system is footproof, but we do what we can. yes, it's a new custom, but one that gives greater transparency and avoids at least some of the problems observed previously.

 

qanonbin is not glowing - pastebin had problems starting last April and several bakers went looking for an alternative as a result. couldn't find one and mentioned it on /baker meta/ thread. turned out a baker there has programming experience and create qanonbin.com, which is more practical imo than pastebin, anyways. but pastebin is also ok, qbin is just preferred by most bakers coz they like it (no captcha and shows a record of recent bakes). But pastebin is fine.

Anonymous ID: b19fea Oct. 2, 2020, 8:35 p.m. No.10896347   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6405 >>6419 >>6422

>>10896213

.as soon as he said he didn't want to post on comms he was instantly attack and called a shill nigger.

NOT TRUE AT ALL.

baker was NOT attacked.

was there and talked with him extensively.

he had never baked and wanted to bake during the day, fast bred, coz it didn't look hard, he said

Had he done so, would have screwed things up pretty good so other bakers said, try evenings/nights, try either practice baking or t least shadow note-taking at first.

Offered reasonable alternatives for a brand new baker.

So fuck off with the "kitch is compd" crap. Especially using this example.

Anonymous ID: b19fea Oct. 2, 2020, 8:37 p.m. No.10896365   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6459

>>10896266

>the comms bakers contrived the "raids" from warroom changing the dough as a way to justify refusing to hand off except among themselves.

NOPE.

TOTALLY 100% FALSE.

Not gonna waste my time arguing about it, have done so many times previously.

Complete and utter waste of time.

Have a nice day.

Anonymous ID: b19fea Oct. 2, 2020, 8:43 p.m. No.10896449   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6472 >>6489

>>10896384

>>10896199 Moar digs on logically.ai, the startup that is looking to dox qresear.ch - DIG CALL

nom notable

i dug a little on logically.ai

looks for "disinformation"

so fits the profile of an anti-Q group

is worth a notable as a DIG imo

but dig needs to show clear link to dox imo

i hope this will happen