party in the back biden is hilarious
>the significance of "baseless"
still disingenuous.
it's more of a desperate cope for people not to even think about looking at evidence.
but it's fundamentally illogical: if it was truly baseless and all illusions, then it would never have gained any traction, or need constant attempts at deflection
yes, it's explained in the long haul.
not everyone is up to it. their choice…
the early promises & headfakes, all part of it.
confirmations remaining ambiguous or complicated enough that those who choose not to believe still can, all part of it.
so i can eat pawpaw and chill with goats without a mask?
yeah, i would expect they wouldn't like it.
but seems like a flavor of hunting that's actually real sport, takes some effort.
>What confirmed these capabilities to the world?
take your pick?
RFK is another pretty high mark
you ask why? odd.
Politics. Was uneasy but still better to get him before he won.
The real question here is the How.
And the techniques used to have a patsy less problematic than the Oswalds. Didn't work perfectly, though, but still
hello rejected nerdy kids in the back of the show taking notes
you're still as sad
some of us are too, but at least we're not soul whores like you
gotta be some muck in the moat
there you go, good. open up
> msm whores ARE lurking and taking notes here
Yes. That is an adress to THEM, read again