Anonymous ID: 20671f Oct. 3, 2020, 10:21 a.m. No.10902610   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10902464

>legal precedent for a SCOTUS recess appontment

 

"โ€ฆone of the Justices regarded as a giant on the Courtโ€™s history, William J. Brennan, Jr., actually began his lengthy career with just such a short-term appointment. The chances of that happening again today seem to have diminished markedly.

 

The presidential authority at issue in this possible scenario exists, according to Article II, when the Senate has gone into recess and the vacancy a president seeks to fill remains. Such an appointment requires no action at all by the Senate, but the appointee can only serve until the end of the following Senate session. The president (if still in office) can then try again during a new Senate session, by making a new nomination, and that must be reviewed by the Senate.

 

The Supreme Court had never clarified that power until its decision in June 2014 in National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning.

 

The decision was something of a compromise. The Court expanded the concept of when the Senate would be in recess so that the president could make a temporary appointment, but it also gave the Senate more control over when it does recess and how long the recesses last. The gesture toward the Senateโ€™s choices was probably the more important result.

 

Here, specifically, is what the Court decided:"

 

https://www.scotusblog.com/2016/02/is-a-recess-appointment-to-the-court-an-option/

Anonymous ID: 20671f Oct. 3, 2020, 10:34 a.m. No.10902777   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10902520

Agreed. For this, though, we have Q's drops and our own careful discernment.

 

Q has made many movie references. A good plot in a movie or novel guides the reader or viewer through stages of engagement and emotions.

 

"They" have stage-managed our perception of events and our very reality.

 

POTUS is turning their tools against them.

 

Treat this like drama. Use the plot clues and guess where the story will go next.

Anonymous ID: 20671f Oct. 3, 2020, 10:53 a.m. No.10902982   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2993

>>10902759

 

Could you ask SpouseAnon a question or two?

 

What if the writ of habeas corpus was suspended like during the Civil War?

 

Are there any conditions under which those that need to be apprehended could be legally apprehended and held without standard (peace time) legal precedents being met?