>>1090421 (previous bread)

Agree. Wrote a long post earlier but never published it. It's time to put up or shut up. Things on my end are at the breaking point, and there's no good reason NOT to drop an important narrative breaking, image breaking, picture/video of bho or the Hildabeast at this point.

It's been over two years now since we heard about the NY offices of the FBI (?) maintained a copy of the hard drive on Weiner's laptop…full of incriminating material, that keeps people awake at night. When? When, when?

Yesterday, when I called Comey a career Clown fixer for the Clinton crime-machine, the people I was talking to played dumb. "What is your evidence?" they asked. All I was able to do is use Comey's own book quotes and Congressional testimony, but that wasn't enough. These people don't want to believe. They will fight against real incriminating evidence. In the meantime more and more people have thrown in the towel.

The time for action was yesterday. My last remaining hope is Horowitz's report. Been waiting for ages now and I understand it's due any day. Will reserve judgment until then. But a drop of BHO in tribal attire spraying the red, white and blue with an AK-47, or an audio leak of Bill promosing Loretta a Supreme Court spot wouldn't hurt. Maybe something on Seth Rich or Scalia, whatever. Let's go! RELEASE THE VIDEO!

>>1091007

Dude, I fucking read that EVERY time I enter a bread. I've heard the arguments, I get it. There's also a valid counter-argument, which if you refuse to entertain, is on you. Drops have been made multiple times, meme campaigns have arisen as a result, and like the OP stated, nothing became of them. So is all disinfo? Is that our purpose? To be used to spread disinfo? Enjoy if that's what you want to do, but get off deez nutz pleaze.

>>1091012

Cheers. And thank you. I really wrote out a LONG one this morning, being in a bit of a funk, but it's on the other computer and I've since settled a bit. I don't think raising this issue is too much. Thanks again. I was only agreeing with another anon as well, so there's a significant amount of people feeling this way, I think.

>>1091013

Thank you for the reply anon. But I'm still a bit lost on how to respond/act 'indirectly.

If you can allude to how that's done it would be most appreciated. I will take any advice to heart.

>>1091071

Well said, and I appreciate it. However, as an example, when talking to a relative yesterday (a very blue-pill Democrat), he had never heard of Operation Cassandra, as but one example I raised. I told him it was buried by the MSM and the reporting, unlike Ronan Farrow and the NYT, should have won a Pulitzer Prize for the expose. He of course said he never heard it. I told him the MSM never gave it any airtime. He asked if I felt "Fox News" did, and I replied I'm sure they did.

"So it wasn't buried then. It was covered by the MSM!" he said. That's what I fight on a daily basis, and to your post, that was a story published in a public quasi-mainstream outlet and still, those we need to know about it, have had zero exposure.

Things hitting the public domain have let me down too many times at this point. We need something which will "shock the conscience" of those who are asleep. It's that bad.

>>1091178

To your point. I have been patient, very patient. I've been here since the day President announced his canidacy. I opened a pro-Trump Twatter account that was immediately targeted and shadow-banned from the first day.

No, I don't want to do anything that would dislodge the needed trajectory at acquiring justice. I don't want an OJ, Part II, but that could happen, like it did then, when you have everything lined up dead to rights. There's no way to prevent jury nullification, if it's going to happen.

What I'm asking for is SOMETHING, anything, that will at least be recognized as a symbolic win that those who wish to tear down this administration will be unable to refute. G-d forbid something Q has already alluded to having??? Something which shows the worlld how evil these people are.

We hear about Stormy, we hear Hope Hicks is fired, we hear Trump yells at Wilbur Ross when he's sleeping during cabinet meetings (not that I believe any of these stories are TRUE mind you), but what's the harm on following through on ONE of the MANY DROPS Q has made over the last several months. Lordy, Comey is on his traveling road show denigrating the President 24/7 on every MSM platform, but we must show PATIENCE, 15 months after the election, to have something to return fire and defend him with?

Again, my hope is with Horowitz's report. If that doesn't turn the tide and allow for Sessions to act etc., in my opinion, we might as well stick a fork in it. Sorry to take away the punch bowl, but that's how I feel. And I have been in the trenches for a long, long time. I'm the opposite of an AIM Clown, a Concernfag or Division Shill. I'm simply reporting conditions from my battle stations, and we're taking a lot of casulties.

>>1091099

Nice copy/pasta. The problem is I read those words at the top of every bread, so I'm not sure why you feel the need to repeat them. Kid yourself not, I fully understand the sentiment.

I already addressed you're foolishness, so allow me to copy/pasta:

>>1091034

>>1091051

'Nothing became of them.' Sorry it was unclear.

1. Obama spraying an AK-47 in tribal attire spraying old red, white and blue.

2. Slick Willie and Loretta on the Tarmac, ONE OF EIGHT TAPES SELECTED FOR RELEASE

3. HRC video 5:5 raw -

These people are sick. So help us show those who refuse to believe it. As it stands, they are too busy laughing at our 'conspiracy theories.'

Godspeed to you.

>>1091104

That's an interesting way to approach it anon (performance art). I was afraid it was turning into one big carnival act with Stormy taking center stage as the ringleader. In fact, I'm in the hunt to find the suspect she just drew who threatened her those years ago.

Thanks for the reply.

>>1091069

Yes I agree. That is great news. I did see it. I've become a bit sceptical at this point, so now the best I can say is let's see where it leads. But I do agree, there are things happening (backpage arrest was another recent big one). Just would be nice for one of those BOOM drops to actually, dare I say it, drop!

>>1091169

Thanks soldier, but I've chosen option #3 which you didn't offer.

On that note, have another cup of grape kool-aid.

And remember: "Patriotism and loyality mean never asking questions!"

>>1091350

Sorry I strain you're brain and make you read, oh, all of two paragraphs at most.

Aren't you missing something on MTV when you're busy posting this garbage? By the way, didn't catch your name…you must be very important to the plan to be in a position to tell others to leave.

Suck a dick bitch.

>>1091477

Yes, this is good. I did see it earlier and I replied to it on other anon's posts. All I can say is I hope it works out. I'm rooting for it. However, I have seen other 'things' which seemed important go by without having any lasting impact. I remember when the Congressional special committee anounced they were closing down their investigation in Trump/Russia etc. Would have thought that a news worthy event. Crickets. As long the the cabal can still bury stuff and manipulate investigations, we have a problem. We'll see. And I hope Horowitz's report has a big impact too.

>>1091206

Cheers anon. Thanks for the feedback and sorry for the belated reply. As you probably could see, it's not a popular position to take - questioning the pace of the plan. That becomes a betrayal. I for one don't roll that way. These are fair questions to pose and, as yet, I have not seen an good answer to the questions. Why allude to these shocking things and then never drop them online? As if that's a bad thing?

>>1091262

I agree with you anon. In fact, the shit started far earlier than even Obama, though he was the worst. Probably goes back over a hundred years, if not two.

What I was asking was really specificly related to Q's drops on BHO w/ AK-47, HRC video or the audio (one of eight tapes?), of uncle Bill and Loretta on the Tarmac. Anons spent countless hours meming those things, and nothing has ever come to pass. If they want to yell at me for raising the issue, fine. I take shit everyday for defending President Trump and explaining how bad the Hildabeast would have been had she won. What I'm asking for is a little more in the way of evidence to penetrate normies defenses. It's a shame when that is interpreted as not 'trusting the plan.'

>>1091497

>>1091497

What I wrote was sarcasm. That is my point, I'm being ganged up on for doing just that. Asking questions about what is going on with the Q drops? You misinterpreted what I was saying.