Anonymous ID: e8d70e April 18, 2018, 10:58 a.m. No.1091037   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1052 >>1469 >>1573

▶Q !xowAT4Z3VQ 04/16/18 (Mon) 08:25:24 ID: 057416 No.1064908>>1064923 >>1064924 >>1064925 >>1064926 >>1064933 >>1064935 >>1064938 >>1064940 >>1064942 >>1064943 >>1064946 >>1064950 >>1064952 >>1064955 >>1064958 >>1064959 >>1064964 >>1064965 >>1064967 >>1064970 >>1064977 >>1064978 >>1064988 >>1064997 >>1065012 >>1065014 >>1065025 >>1065034 >>1065036 >>1065044 >>1065048 >>1065058 >>1065081 >>1065091 >>1065100 >>1065104 >>1065109 >>1065112 >>1065115 >>1065120 >>1065139 >>1065141 >>1065152 >>1065164 >>1065167 >>1065172

 

https:// www.iqt.org/portfolio/

 

Q

 

NOTEABLE

In QTell - "Wikileaks OUTs Brenner" - future proves past

Anonymous ID: e8d70e April 18, 2018, 11:30 a.m. No.1091348   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1449

(old bread)

Anonymous 04/18/18 (Wed) 02:57:32 ID: c889ce No.1087772

 

>>1087761

 

Also, to conclude, Scalia calls out the issue before passing and, quite literally, brings up the scare tactics used.

 

 

https:// www.dailysignal.com/2015/06/25/top-9-quotes-from-scalias-scathing-dissent-in-king-v-burwell/

 

 

Long story short, I believe this is why he would have been taken out if that indeed happened. To open the door this very case.

Anonymous ID: e8d70e April 18, 2018, 11:41 a.m. No.1091449   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1091199

okay, the CASE https:// www.dailysignal.com/2015/06/25/top-9-quotes-from-scalias-scathing-dissent-in-king-v-burwell/

 

is valid Saauce I'll give yu that~

Give me this Noteable please…

>>1091348

"BURWELL RESUME"

(Pic Related repost) Thx Baker~