Any anon who wants to attempt to reason with the "Comms Crew" bakers, good luck, they will probably just call you OSS or Soros shills, get butthurt and deflect. I tried.
>>/comms/12561
Any anon who wants to attempt to reason with the "Comms Crew" bakers, good luck, they will probably just call you OSS or Soros shills, get butthurt and deflect. I tried.
>>/comms/12561
>Any anon who wants to attempt to reason with the "Comms Crew" bakers, good luck, they will probably just call you OSS or Soros shills, get butthurt and deflect. I tried.
See for yourself.
>>>/comms/29962
>>>/comms/30009
>>>/comms/30011
I suggest you read their responses to this mess in their little bunker.
Do you want a kitchen that is limited only to a small in-group of gatekeepers?
by informing other anons. we need hard evidence of bad bakers' poor behavior. Many will come to the board in the coming days and weeks who don't know how BTFO the bad bakers got today.
Mostly namefag acronym bakers in this group on >>>/comms/.
like WNB, GB, NB, Doc, Watcher, etc.
>BASELESS ATTACKS BY CONSPIRACY THEORISTS ON HARDWORKING PUBLIC SERVANTS
>ANONS' WAR ON BAKERS: TONIGHT ON CNN
I vote Don't remove it.