>>10912336

Quick run down

>Someone posts evidence of regular bakers being shills

>aka the "Comms" bakers

>they use the /comms/ board to discuss baking and coordinating

>faggy lingo and don't hand off to anons, only verified bakers

>suspicious…

>Anons see

>posts in Baker Meta bread about it

>>10756139 Baker Meta

>fire spreads

>anons revolt

>new baker, no verify

>both breads have equal posts until the end

>comms bakers and anon baker make new bread

>bread split continues

>Anon baker bread wins out popular postcount

>namefag comms bakers BTFO

>Anon Baker bakes

>adds gloating victory notes into notables

>Fun times

>Uh oh

>Anon Baker starts acting sketchy

>continues being hostile and gloating, poor sport

>turns out Comms Bakers have seen this before

>tactic used before to divide

>>>/comms/12561 dont believe me read up (start around 19:00 EST)

>Anon Baker starts posting pastebin that 404's (aka no bread)

>Called out last bread on it

>Lies, twists and finally posts the dough

>Comms bakers actually for the most part patriots, but can seem like a faggy circle jerk in group some times (ok maybe a lot)

>oops

>you are here, in Anon Baker's 4th bread or so

don't believe me look into it urself

>>>/comms/12561 Commsfags

>>10756139 Baker Meta

warning its AIDS

TLDR

>comms bakers arent a shady cabal imo

who cares this is baker drama just post

DIGS

MEMES

PRAYERS

RESEARCH

>>10912476

>made up graphics of connections produced by oss is not proof but they decide it is and continually spam it hoping to fool people.

Correct.

that line where you stopped was just the hook to keep reading basically.

idk about OSS because I wasnt here for that shit.

>>10912541

plus those "graphics", and wall of text spam with all the "damning" evidence against some of the regular bakers, are such an utter eyesore its almost like they are designed to make you waste time trying to decipher it. Really makes you think

>>10912555

Checked. What was the last stunt? Same shit or different tactic?

>>10912577

nice clusterfuck of a graphic. Took me a few hours to get through all your bullshit and read these posts you're making, shitting on the regular bakers. Figured it out eventually tho, anons can too if they want to waste time on your horrendous ugly images and spam. Congrats, you wasted my time, and made yourself an enemy.

>Cherrypicking every time the regular bakers say mean words in this shitposty war zone

try focusing on anything they do thats actually bad, and condense it, if you want people convinced that youre being sincere. Faggot.

>>10912602

Regular

>: one who is regular: such as

>a : one who is usually present or participating especially : a long-standing regular customer

>b : one who can be trusted or depended on a party regular

>c : a player on an athletic team who usually starts every game

>d : one of the regular clergy

>e : a soldier in a regular army

>>10912601

Thanks anon, good lookin out

>>10912651

exactly, compared to the butthurt constipated bakers

>>10912688

>Yet here you are whining like the little bitches you are

au contraire anon, im having a grand old time.

>The Breads have been working quite successfully without the Comms Bakers

The notables have been a little bit lower quality, and the dough was missing a few times (rookie mistake) but otherwise, you're right.

>>10912707

Video

>>10912714

>Translation

>Let me put words in your mouth

well, the notables had a bunch of baker drama, some unsauced stuff, less scrutiny, and were extremely long

Little bit lower quality, not a lot lower quality. notes have good info in them still.

>>10912760

Indeed they can! and how everyone else behaved. its all here.

>>10912824

>>>10912480 1325 time stamp & Qpost 1325

not notable, random anonpost that looks "kind of Q-ish"

>>>10912652 1353 time stamp & Qpost 1353

not notable, random anonpost that looks "kind of Q-ish"