Anonymous ID: 7636b9 Oct. 4, 2020, 12:03 a.m. No.10913217   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3226 >>3417 >>3496 >>3607 >>3708 >>4013 >>4049

>>10913139

I hereby make a claim of /comms/baker fuckery

this claim is the foundational reason for the splitting of the bread today

the bread was split for the reason of:

Violation of First Principles

 

First Principle Violated:

-anons not allowed to bake as anon

 

Example 1 of Ongoing Issue

/comms/bakers refuse to handoff to anons

4 /comms/bakers involved in this example (4 unique UID's)

pic related includes 3 of these bakers

would have included 4th but pic related getting too large to digest

 

Bread #13946

/comms/bakers refuse to handoff to anons

anon wasfirst to offerto take bake

/comms/baker 'be' refuses to pass without qbin pre-verification

/comms/bakers proceed to defend brand new baker hand-off pre-verification procedure that was created by these same /comms/bakers

/comms/bakers require anon to selfdox/namefag in order to bake

 

since when are anons not allowed to bake as anon?

 

pic very related

 

input from anons requested

how does this look to you anons?

easy to understand?

is everything sauced?

UIDs โ†’ /comms/baker ID's

too big? (what should be removed?)

 

At least 2 more examples of the above are being sauced and proofed

will post when done

 

thank you for (you)r consideration

o7

Anonymous ID: 7636b9 Oct. 4, 2020, 1:05 a.m. No.10913661   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3736 >>3787 >>3930

>>10913628

>Pardon me, I meant to say A previous bread.

5:5 anon

that happens during bread wars

multiple breads with same bread number are baked at same time

anons know

anons will fill the legit bread with digs, reasearch, and organic original memes

the shill bread will get filled with copypasta spam, porn, and muhjews shit

as such, the shill bread will never reach 751 posts

it will get bumped randomly, and as such will find its way to the top of the catalog time and time again

but thankfully

anons know

Anonymous ID: 7636b9 Oct. 4, 2020, 1:07 a.m. No.10913680   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3742

>>10913634

>who can delete their comms threads?

BO of /comms/ is Rusty

BV of /comms/ is Frebe/Freebaker/GYB

5:5 anon

keep your eyes open

see something

say something

 

this is merely an opening scirmish in what will become an extended conflict

Anonymous ID: 7636b9 Oct. 4, 2020, 1:18 a.m. No.10913752   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10913720

>And it should be accepted that some bakers will be shills who will monkey with the dough.

this

perfection is becoming the enemy of the good

no matter what we attempt to do, shills will grab the bake from time to time

honestly, I prefer it

keeps us on our toes

keeps us sharp

keeps us discerning

instead of just assuming everything is gravy because the litchen is perfect

 

that like some Titanic, the ship that cant sink level logic.

Anonymous ID: 7636b9 Oct. 4, 2020, 1:19 a.m. No.10913759   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10913720

>all baker have ultimate discretion and responsibility over what they put in their own bakes, and they are not expected to comply with community consensus

BOOM

 

bakers are responsible for their own work product

bakers are answerable tothe anons

always

Anonymous ID: 7636b9 Oct. 4, 2020, 1:35 a.m. No.10913851   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10913770

>And here you are putting it all in notables, which goes out to aggregators everywhere. Four outta six notables.

muhAggregators

 

what was it Q taught us?

 

archive everything online

but dont take responsiblity for doing it yourself

so actually its:

allow your favorite aggregator to archive the stuff they think is important online, where they can be shoah'd at anytime by a cancelmob

 

yeah, yeah

thats it

Anonymous ID: 7636b9 Oct. 4, 2020, 2:12 a.m. No.10914054   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10914002

>Our traditions have evolved over time. Some are formal but most are not; they are a part of Qresearch culture, a culture enriched by the efforts of creative autists and ennobled by the ideals of Q patriots.

go be a faggot somewhere else, "anon"